Academy of Psychology and Behaviour, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061566. Print 2013.
We examined performance in the antisaccade task for younger and older adults by comparing latencies and errors in what we defined as high attentional focus (mixed antisaccades and prosaccades in the same block) and low attentional focus (antisaccades and prosaccades in separate blocks) conditions. Shorter saccade latencies for correctly executed eye movements were observed for both groups in mixed, compared to blocked, antisaccade tasks, but antisaccade error rates were higher for older participants across both conditions. The results are discussed in relation to the inhibitory hypothesis, the goal neglect theory and attentional control theory.
我们通过比较高注意力集中(同一组块中混合了反扫视和正扫视)和低注意力集中(不同组块中分别为反扫视和正扫视)条件下的潜伏期和错误率,来研究年轻人和老年人在反扫视任务中的表现。与分组的反扫视任务相比,两组在混合的反扫视任务中,正确执行眼动的扫视潜伏期更短,但在两种条件下,老年人的反扫视错误率都更高。研究结果与抑制假说、目标忽视理论和注意力控制理论有关。