Suppr超能文献

我们和他们在疗愈之屋:阿拉伯补充医学从业者关于支持癌症护理的综合与替代方法的辩论。

We and they in the house of healing: debate among Arab complementary medicine practitioners on an integrative versus alternative approach to supportive cancer care.

机构信息

Lin Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel.

出版信息

Integr Cancer Ther. 2013 Nov;12(6):488-95. doi: 10.1177/1534735413485818. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Complementary and traditional medicine (CTM) plays an important role in culture-centered care for cancer patients in the Middle East. In this article, we have studied the attitudes of Arab CTM therapists concerning integration of complementary medicine within the conventional supportive cancer care of Arab patients in northern Israel.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were held with 27 Arab therapists who use medicinal herbs, the Quran, and various CTM modalities, with the aim of characterizing their treatment practices and learning about their perspectives regarding conventional cancer care.

RESULTS

We first summarized the different characteristics of the various CTM therapists, including training, typical practice, and so on. Thematic analysis revealed that folk healers and complementary medicine therapists describe their role as supportive and secondary to that of physicians. Their goal was not to cure patients with cancer but rather to enhance their quality of life by reducing the severity of both the disease symptoms and the side effects of cancer treatment. Religious healers, by contrast, purport to cure the disease. While folk healers opt for parallel alternative care and complementary therapists support integrative care, religious healers claimed that they offer an alternative to conventional medicine in terms of both etiology and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Arab CTM therapists support integration of their treatments with the conventional system, but in practice, they are not sure how to bring about this change or create a parallel model in which 2 different systems are active, but not integrated. Our findings emphasized the need to promote doctor-CTM practitioner communication based on structured referral and bidirectional consultation. Moreover, we recommend intensifying research on the efficacy and safety of CTM in the Middle East and the potential role in promoting culture-based supportive care.

摘要

目的

在中东,补充和传统医学(CTM)在以文化为中心的癌症患者护理中发挥着重要作用。在本文中,我们研究了阿拉伯 CTM 治疗师对将补充医学纳入阿拉伯患者在以色列北部的常规支持性癌症护理的态度。

方法

对 27 名使用草药、《古兰经》和各种 CTM 方式的阿拉伯治疗师进行半结构式访谈,旨在描述他们的治疗实践,并了解他们对常规癌症护理的看法。

结果

我们首先总结了不同 CTM 治疗师的不同特点,包括培训、典型实践等。主题分析显示,民间治疗师和补充医学治疗师将自己的角色描述为支持性的,次于医生。他们的目标不是治愈癌症患者,而是通过减轻疾病症状和癌症治疗副作用的严重程度来提高他们的生活质量。相比之下,宗教治疗师声称可以治愈疾病。民间治疗师选择平行替代治疗,补充治疗师支持整合治疗,而宗教治疗师则声称他们在病因和实践方面提供了一种替代常规医学的方法。

结论

大多数阿拉伯 CTM 治疗师支持将他们的治疗与常规系统相结合,但实际上,他们不确定如何实现这一转变,或者创建一个平行模型,使 2 种不同的系统都活跃但不整合。我们的研究结果强调了需要基于结构化转诊和双向咨询促进医生与 CTM 从业者之间的沟通。此外,我们建议加强对中东 CTM 的疗效和安全性以及在促进基于文化的支持性护理方面的潜在作用的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验