• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双心室起搏在晚期收缩性心力衰竭之外的潜在作用。

Potential role of biventricular pacing beyond advanced systolic heart failure.

机构信息

Institute of Vascular Medicine, Division of Cardiology and Heart Education And Research Training (HEART) Center, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, SAR.

出版信息

Circ J. 2013;77(6):1364-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0398. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1253/circj.cj-13-0398
PMID:23628947
Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective therapy for advanced heart failure (HF) patients. The indications are well defined in recent guidelines and broadly indicate that CRT is suitable for chronic HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and in NYHA class III or IV (Class I), and those with prolonged QRS duration ≥120 ms with left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology, or QRS duration ≥150 ms irrespective of QRS morphology (Class IIa). For patients with NYHA class II symptoms, CRT is recommended for patients with EF ≤30% and QRS duration ≥130 ms with LBBB QRS morphology (Class I, level of evidence: A), or QRS duration ≥150 ms irrespective of QRS morphology (Class IIa, level of evidence: A). However, CRT may benefit additional patients outside these criteria. In this review, we summarize the role of CRT in some subgroups, including patients with mild and moderate HF, upgrading to CRT from right ventricular (RV) pacing, bradycardia patients with routine pacing indications, congenital heart disease and specific cardiomyopathies. It is possible that CRT can give symptomatic and mortality benefits in some of these subgroups in the future and further clinical trials are warranted.

摘要

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)是治疗晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者的有效方法。最近的指南对其适应证进行了明确的定义,广泛表明 CRT 适用于左心室射血分数(EF)≤35%和 NYHA 心功能分级 III 或 IV 级(I 类)的慢性 HF 患者,以及伴有持续 QRS 时限≥120 ms 并呈左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)QRS 形态的患者,或无论 QRS 形态如何 QRS 时限≥150 ms 的患者(IIa 类)。对于 NYHA 心功能 II 级症状的患者,对于 EF≤30%且伴有 LBBB QRS 形态的 QRS 时限≥130 ms 的患者(I 类,证据水平:A),或无论 QRS 形态如何 QRS 时限≥150 ms 的患者(IIa 类,证据水平:A),建议行 CRT。然而,CRT 可能会使这些标准之外的其他患者获益。在这篇综述中,我们总结了 CRT 在一些亚组患者中的作用,包括轻度和中度 HF 患者、从右心室(RV)起搏升级为 CRT 的患者、有常规起搏适应证的心动过缓患者、先天性心脏病和特定心肌病患者。在未来,CRT 可能会使这些亚组中的一些患者在症状和死亡率方面获益,需要进一步的临床试验。

相似文献

1
Potential role of biventricular pacing beyond advanced systolic heart failure.双心室起搏在晚期收缩性心力衰竭之外的潜在作用。
Circ J. 2013;77(6):1364-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0398. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
2
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardiac devices in patients with systolic heart failure.植入式心脏装置在收缩性心力衰竭患者中的成本效益
Heart. 2016 Nov 1;102(21):1742-1749. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308883. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure and QRS interval ≤130 ms: insights from a meta-analysis.心脏再同步治疗在收缩性心力衰竭且 QRS 间期≤130ms 患者中的应用:一项荟萃分析的观点。
Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):267-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu214. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
New York Heart Association functional class, QRS duration, and survival in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications for cardiac resychronization therapy.纽约心脏协会功能分级、QRS 持续时间与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的生存:心脏再同步治疗的意义。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):366-376. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.563. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Long term outcomes in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy.升级为心脏再同步治疗的慢性右心室起搏患者的长期预后
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Oct;30(10):1979-1983. doi: 10.1111/jce.14038. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Eligibility for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients hospitalized with heart failure.心力衰竭住院患者心脏再同步治疗的适应证。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;5(4):668-674. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12297. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Assessment of right ventriclular systolic function prior to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Does it make any difference?心脏再同步治疗前右心室收缩功能的评估:有何差异?
Indian Heart J. 2017 Nov-Dec;69(6):731-735. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
8
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
9
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
10
Will biventricular pacing replace right ventricular pacing for antibradycardia therapy?双心室起搏能否替代右心室起搏用于抗心动过缓治疗?
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Sep;10(5):591-6. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2013.835552.

引用本文的文献

1
Early and Late Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.成人心血管病心脏再同步治疗的早晚期效应。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e012744. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012744. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
2
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy and Heart Failure: Persepctive from 5P Medicine.心脏再同步治疗与心力衰竭:5P医学视角
Card Fail Rev. 2015 Apr;1(1):35-37. doi: 10.15420/CFR.2015.01.01.35.
3
The changing landscape of cardiac pacing.心脏起搏不断变化的格局。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2015 Mar;26(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-014-0346-2.
4
Arrhythmias: Changing indications for biventricular pacing in bradycardia.心律失常:缓慢性心律失常患者应用双心室起搏治疗适应证的变化。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;10(8):436-8. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.88. Epub 2013 Jun 11.