Suppr超能文献

人格、伤害与利益:对阿尔贝托·吉比里尼和弗朗西斯卡·明内尔瓦的回应。

Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.

机构信息

Centre for Faith, Ethics & Society, University of Notre Dame, PO Box 944 Broadway 2007, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e1-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100692.

Abstract

In the article 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?' arguments are made in favour of the moral permissibility of intentionally killing newborn infants, under particular conditions. Here we argue that their arguments are based on an indefensible view of personhood, and we question the logic of harm and interest that informs their arguments. Furthermore, we argue that the conclusions here are so contrary to ordinary moral intuitions that the argument and conclusions based upon it-including those which defend more mainstream methods of abortion-should be treated with immediate suspicion.

摘要

在文章《死后堕胎:为什么婴儿应该活着?》中,有人提出在特定条件下,故意杀死新生儿在道德上是允许的。在这里,我们认为他们的论点基于一种不可捍卫的人格观点,我们质疑他们论点中所依据的伤害和利益逻辑。此外,我们认为这里的结论与普通的道德直觉如此相悖,以至于基于该论点的结论——包括那些为更主流的堕胎方法辩护的结论——应该立即受到怀疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验