• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价一组特应性埃及儿童的香蕉过敏情况:与父母/自身报告的关系。

Evaluation of banana hypersensitivity among a group of atopic egyptian children: relation to parental/self reports.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2013 May;5(3):150-4. doi: 10.4168/aair.2013.5.3.150. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

DOI:10.4168/aair.2013.5.3.150
PMID:23638313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3636449/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the frequency of banana sensitization and allergy among a group of atopic Egyptian children in relation to parental/self reports.

METHODS

This is a case-control study included 2 groups of allergic children with and without history of banana allergy, each included 40 patients. They were subjected to skin prick test (SPT) using commercial banana allergen extract and prick-prick test (PPT) using raw banana, in addition to measuring the serum banana-specific IgE. Oral banana challenge was performed in suspected cases.

RESULTS

Banana allergy was diagnosed in 3 (7.5%) patients based on positive history of allergy on exposure to banana, positive SPT/PPT and elevated banana-specific IgE. The 3 patients had bronchial asthma with exacerbation upon banana exposure. The PPT results conform with those of SPT both in diagnosis of banana allergy and in the skin reactivity to banana. Serum banana-specific IgE was detectable in the whole studied sample with higher serum level among those without history of banana allergy (P=0.005). Oral banana challenge was negative for 20 patients with history of banana allergy and positive serum banana-specific IgE but negative SPT and PPT.

CONCLUSIONS

Self/parental reports of banana allergy is high while the actual banana allergy is uncommon. The PPT seems as reliable as SPT in diagnosis of banana allergy unlike specific IgE which reflects sensitization rather than allergy. Oral food challenge remains the most helpful tool for diagnosis of food allergy in suspected cases.

摘要

目的

评估一组埃及特应性儿童中香蕉致敏和过敏的频率与父母/自身报告的关系。

方法

这是一项病例对照研究,包括两组有和无香蕉过敏史的过敏儿童,每组各 40 例。他们接受了商业香蕉过敏原提取物的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和生香蕉的点刺-点刺试验(PPT),此外还测量了血清香蕉特异性 IgE。在疑似病例中进行了口服香蕉挑战。

结果

根据暴露于香蕉时过敏的阳性病史、阳性 SPT/PPT 和升高的香蕉特异性 IgE,诊断出 3 例(7.5%)患者患有香蕉过敏。这 3 例患者均有支气管哮喘,在暴露于香蕉时哮喘加重。PPT 结果在诊断香蕉过敏和皮肤对香蕉的反应性方面与 SPT 结果一致。在整个研究样本中均可检测到血清香蕉特异性 IgE,而无香蕉过敏史的患者血清水平更高(P=0.005)。在有香蕉过敏史和阳性血清香蕉特异性 IgE 但 SPT 和 PPT 阴性的 20 例患者中,口服香蕉挑战为阴性。

结论

自身/父母报告的香蕉过敏很高,而实际的香蕉过敏却不常见。与反映致敏而不是过敏的特异性 IgE 不同,PPT 似乎与 SPT 一样可靠,可用于诊断香蕉过敏。口服食物挑战仍然是疑似病例中诊断食物过敏最有用的工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of banana hypersensitivity among a group of atopic egyptian children: relation to parental/self reports.评价一组特应性埃及儿童的香蕉过敏情况:与父母/自身报告的关系。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2013 May;5(3):150-4. doi: 10.4168/aair.2013.5.3.150. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
2
Latex hypersensitivity among allergic Egyptian children: relation to parental/self reports.埃及过敏儿童中的乳胶过敏:与父母/自我报告的关系
Pulm Med. 2014;2014:629187. doi: 10.1155/2014/629187. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
3
The diagnosis of Brazil nut allergy using history, skin prick tests, serum-specific immunoglobulin E and food challenges.通过病史、皮肤点刺试验、血清特异性免疫球蛋白E和食物激发试验诊断巴西坚果过敏。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Feb;36(2):226-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02426.x.
4
Banana anaphylaxis in Thailand: case series.泰国的香蕉过敏反应:病例系列
Asia Pac Allergy. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e4. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e4. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
Atopy patch test in the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome.特应性皮炎综合征患儿食物过敏诊断中的斑贴试验
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2005;50:261-7.
6
Risk factors for latex allergy in patients with spina bifida and latex sensitization.脊柱裂和乳胶致敏患者乳胶过敏的危险因素。
Clin Exp Allergy. 1999 May;29(5):681-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00541.x.
7
Skin prick test responses and allergen-specific IgE levels as predictors of peanut, egg, and sesame allergy in infants.皮肤点刺试验反应和过敏原特异性 IgE 水平可预测婴儿花生、鸡蛋和芝麻过敏。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Oct;132(4):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
8
The prevalence of latex allergy in children seen in a university hospital allergy clinic.在一家大学医院过敏诊所就诊的儿童中乳胶过敏的患病率。
Allergy. 1997 Jan;52(1):101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02553.x.
9
Is kiwifruit allergy a matter in kiwifruit-cultivating regions? A population-based study.在猕猴桃种植地区,猕猴桃过敏是个问题吗?一项基于人群的研究。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017 Feb;28(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/pai.12666. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10
Reactivity to potential cross-reactive foods in fruit-allergic patients: implications for prescribing food avoidance.水果过敏患者对潜在交叉反应性食物的反应:对开具食物回避处方的启示。
Allergy. 2002 Oct;57(10):946-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23626.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Not Just a Banana: The Extent of Fruit Cross-Reactivity and Reaction Severity in Adults with Banana Allergy.不仅仅是香蕉:香蕉过敏成人中水果交叉反应的程度和反应严重程度
Foods. 2023 Jun 23;12(13):2456. doi: 10.3390/foods12132456.
2
Incidence, triggering factors, symptoms, and treatment of anaphylaxis in a pediatric hospital.一家儿科医院中过敏反应的发病率、触发因素、症状及治疗方法。
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Aug 21;15(9):100689. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100689. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Banana anaphylaxis in Thailand: case series.泰国的香蕉过敏反应:病例系列
Asia Pac Allergy. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e4. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e4. eCollection 2020 Jan.
4
Challenges of managing food allergy in the developing world.发展中世界食物过敏管理面临的挑战。
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Dec 2;12(11):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100089. eCollection 2019 Nov.
5
Prevalence of food allergens sensitization and food allergies in a group of allergic Honduran children.一组洪都拉斯过敏儿童中食物过敏原致敏和食物过敏的患病率。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun 18;14:23. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0245-x. eCollection 2018.
6
A 4-month-old baby boy presenting with anaphylaxis to a banana: a case report.一名4个月大男婴对香蕉过敏:病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2014 Feb 19;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-62.

本文引用的文献

1
Immediate hypersensitivity to common food allergens: an investigation on food sensitization in respiratory allergic patients of calcutta, India.常见食物过敏原的即刻超敏反应:印度加尔各答呼吸道过敏性患者食物致敏情况的调查。
World Allergy Organ J. 2009 Jan;2(1):9-12. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e318194c0de.
2
Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter.过敏诊断检测:更新后的实践参数。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Mar;100(3 Suppl 3):S1-148. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60305-5.
3
The prevalence of plant food allergies: a systematic review.植物性食物过敏的患病率:一项系统综述。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 May;121(5):1210-1218.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.019. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
4
Usefulness of the skin index in predicting the outcome of oral challenges in children.皮肤指数在预测儿童口服激发试验结果中的应用价值。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2007;17(4):207-10.
5
Further fatalities caused by anaphylactic reactions to food, 2001-2006.2001 - 2006年因食物过敏反应导致的更多死亡案例
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):1016-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.622. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
6
Ruling out food allergy in pediatrics and preventing the "march" of the allergic child.排除小儿食物过敏并预防过敏儿童的“疾病进展”。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2006 Jul-Aug;27(4):306-11. doi: 10.2500/aap.2006.27.2924.
7
The prick by prick test is safe and reliable in 58 children with atopic dermatitis and food allergy.点刺试验在58例患有特应性皮炎和食物过敏的儿童中是安全可靠的。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006 May-Jun;10(3):115-20.
8
A banana-allergic infant with IgE reactivity to avocado, but not to latex.一名对香蕉过敏且对鳄梨有IgE反应性但对乳胶无反应性的婴儿。
Pediatr Int. 2006 Jun;48(3):321-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2006.02211.x.
9
Incidence of parentally reported and clinically diagnosed food hypersensitivity in the first year of life.父母报告及临床诊断的1岁以内食物过敏发生率。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 May;117(5):1118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1352. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
10
Banana anaphylaxis with a negative commercial skin test.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Mar;115(3):632-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.10.034.