Institute Leloir Fundation - IIBBA-CONICET Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2013 Apr 29;7:53. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00053. eCollection 2013.
Neuroinflammation has received increased attention as a target for putative neuroprotective therapies in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Two prototypic pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) have been implicated as main effectors of the functional consequences of neuroinflammation on neurodegeneration in PD models. In this review, we describe that the functional interaction between these cytokines in the brain differs from the periphery (e.g., their expression is not induced by each other) and present data showing predominantly a toxic effect of these cytokines when expressed at high doses and for a sustained period of time in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SN). In addition, we highlight opposite evidence showing protective effects of these two main cytokines when conditions of duration, amount of expression or state of activation of the target or neighboring cells are changed. Furthermore, we discuss these results in the frame of previous disappointing results from anti-TNF-α clinical trials against Multiple Sclerosis, another neurodegenerative disease with a clear neuroinflammatory component. In conclusion, we hypothesize that the available evidence suggests that the duration and dose of IL-1β or TNF-α expression is crucial to predict their functional effect on the SN. Since these parameters are not amenable for measurement in the SN of PD patients, we call for an in-depth analysis to identify downstream mediators that could be common to the toxic (and not the protective) effects of these cytokines in the SN. This strategy could spare the possible neuroprotective effect of these cytokines operative in the patient at the time of treatment, increasing the probability of efficacy in a clinical setting. Alternatively, receptor-specific agonists or antagonists could also provide a way to circumvent undesired effects of general anti-inflammatory or specific anti-IL-1β or TNF-α therapies against PD.
神经炎症作为帕金森病(PD)中潜在神经保护治疗的靶点受到了越来越多的关注。两种典型的促炎细胞因子白细胞介素-1β(IL-1)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF)被认为是神经炎症对 PD 模型中神经退行性变的功能后果的主要效应因子。在这篇综述中,我们描述了这些细胞因子在大脑中的功能相互作用不同于外周(例如,它们的表达不受彼此诱导),并提供了数据表明,当这些细胞因子在黑质致密部(SN)中以高剂量和持续时间表达时,主要表现出毒性作用。此外,我们强调了相反的证据,表明当靶细胞或相邻细胞的持续时间、表达量或激活状态发生变化时,这两种主要细胞因子具有保护作用。此外,我们还根据针对多发性硬化症(另一种具有明确神经炎症成分的神经退行性疾病)的抗 TNF-α 临床试验的先前令人失望的结果,讨论了这些结果。总之,我们假设现有的证据表明,IL-1β 或 TNF-α 表达的持续时间和剂量对于预测其对 SN 的功能影响至关重要。由于这些参数在 PD 患者的 SN 中不易测量,我们呼吁进行深入分析,以确定下游介质,这些介质可能对这些细胞因子在 SN 中的毒性(而非保护)作用具有共同作用。这种策略可以避免这些细胞因子在治疗时对患者的可能神经保护作用,从而增加在临床环境中产生疗效的可能性。或者,受体特异性激动剂或拮抗剂也可以为一般抗炎或特定抗 IL-1β 或 TNF-α 治疗 PD 提供一种规避不良影响的方法。