*Department of Ophthalmology, Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey; †Department of Ophthalmology, Tokat State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Erzincan University Mengücek Gazi Education and Research Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey; §Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey; ¶Department of Anatomy, Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey; and ‖Department of Ophthalmology, Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cornea. 2013 Nov;32(11):1470-4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a7387f.
To map the thickness of the entire cornea using dual-Scheimpflug imaging and to evaluate the changes in the corneal thickness over the entire cornea at different stages of keratoconus.
Corneal pachymetry was performed using the Galilei dual-Scheimpflug analyzer. The thinnest (TCT), central (CCT), paracentral (PaCT), and peripheral corneal thicknesses (PeCT) were also analyzed. The study examined 150 eyes of 150 patients who had myopia or myopic astigmatism and 107 eyes of 75 patients with keratoconus. Of these 107 eyes, 48 were evaluated at stage I keratoconus, 32 at stage II, 12 at stage III, and 15 at stage IV keratoconus. The level of severity of the keratoconus was based on the Amsler-Krumeich classification.
There were significant decreases in the thickness values of the entire corneas at all the different stages of progression defined in the Amsler-Krumeich classification. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the TCT provided a better parameter than did the CCT, PaCT, and PeCT for distinguishing between keratoconus at its different stages and myopic eyes. Although the TCT and CCT parameters provided an effective distinction of eyes with stage II, III, and IV keratoconus from normal eyes, they were not effective for discriminating eyes with stage I keratoconus from eyes with myopia. But, PaCT and PeCT parameters enabled the effective discrimination between eyes with stage IV keratoconus and those with myopia only.
The data obtained by dual-Scheimpflug imaging for the corneal thicknesses of the entire cornea provide useful information for grading the severity of keratoconus.
使用双 Scheimpflug 成像技术对整个角膜的厚度进行成像,并评估圆锥角膜不同阶段整个角膜厚度的变化。
使用 Galilei 双 Scheimpflug 分析仪进行角膜厚度测量。还分析了最薄(TCT)、中央(CCT)、旁中央(PaCT)和周边角膜厚度(PeCT)。本研究共检查了 150 名近视或近视散光患者的 150 只眼和 75 名圆锥角膜患者的 107 只眼。在这 107 只眼中,48 只眼处于 I 期圆锥角膜,32 只眼处于 II 期,12 只眼处于 III 期,15 只眼处于 IV 期。圆锥角膜的严重程度是基于 Amsler-Krumeich 分类。
在 Amsler-Krumeich 分类定义的所有不同进展阶段,整个角膜的厚度值都有显著下降。接收者操作特征曲线分析表明,TCT 比 CCT、PaCT 和 PeCT 提供了更好的参数,用于区分不同阶段的圆锥角膜和近视眼。尽管 TCT 和 CCT 参数可有效区分 II 期、III 期和 IV 期圆锥角膜眼与正常眼,但它们不能有效区分 I 期圆锥角膜眼与近视眼。但是,PaCT 和 PeCT 参数可有效区分 IV 期圆锥角膜眼与近视眼。
双 Scheimpflug 成像技术获得的整个角膜厚度数据为圆锥角膜严重程度分级提供了有用的信息。