• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双 Scheimpflug 分析仪、GALILEI G6 和扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪 ANTERION 的眼部生物测量学临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital and Rangsit Medical College, 2, Phayatai Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.

Department of Ophthalmology, Priest Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1
PMID:35246594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8897498/
Abstract

To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably.

摘要

为了评估新型 swept source 光学相干断层扫描光学生物测量仪 ANTERION 在眼生物测量和人工晶状体 (IOL) 计算方面的性能,与 Dual Scheimpflug 分析器 (GALILEI,G6) 的参考标准进行比较。在一家三级眼科中心进行了前瞻性的比较研究。以随机的方式用两种设备对白内障患者进行扫描,并根据平均值差异和组内相关系数 (ICC) 分析设备参数。进行 Bland-Altman 图以比较两种设备之间的一致性。96 名患者的 96 只眼被纳入评估。除 ACD 外,所有参数均有显著差异,但所有参数的一致性均较好。眼轴长度的平均差异为 0.03mm,ICC 为 0.999。用 Barrett 公式计算的人工晶状体屈光度显示,93.75%在 1 屈光度以内,预测误差为 0.03 屈光度。两种设备的生物测量值在算法上有所不同。然而,IOL 计算中关键因素的平均差异较小,在临床应用中似乎可以忽略不计。ANTERION 的性能在生物测量和 IOL 计算方面与 G6 相当;然而,这两种设备不能互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/37877a9059d2/41598_2022_7696_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/71041b918fe4/41598_2022_7696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/9f6f71225e19/41598_2022_7696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/c539383768a0/41598_2022_7696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/639046181595/41598_2022_7696_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/37877a9059d2/41598_2022_7696_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/71041b918fe4/41598_2022_7696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/9f6f71225e19/41598_2022_7696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/c539383768a0/41598_2022_7696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/639046181595/41598_2022_7696_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c47/8897498/37877a9059d2/41598_2022_7696_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION.双 Scheimpflug 分析仪、GALILEI G6 和扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪 ANTERION 的眼部生物测量学临床评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1.
2
Biometry and intraocular power calculation using a swept-source optical coherence tomography: A repeatability and agreement study.应用扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪的生物测量和眼内屈光力计算:重复性和一致性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;70(8):2845-2850. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_249_22.
3
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.使用三种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备对白内障患者眼部生物测量的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5.
4
Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices.使用两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备评估原发性闭角型青光眼的眼生物测量学
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265844. eCollection 2022.
5
The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.双重 Scheimpflug 设备与集成式光学生物测量仪的生物测量重复性和一致性。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11953-8.
6
Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.一种新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术光学生物测量仪与一种时域光学相干断层扫描技术光学生物测量仪的临床比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;41(10):2224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.03.019.
7
Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.基于新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的光学生物测量仪与其他设备的眼部生物测量比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;32(4):257-264. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0091.
8
Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers.比较三种生物测量仪的测量值和计算的晶状体屈光度:带有部分相干干涉测量术的 Scheimpflug 断层扫描仪和两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03658-5.
9
Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study.基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描的生物测量法用于人工晶状体屈光力计算的准确性:一项回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1036-y.
10
Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.基于扫频源光学相干生物测量仪 IOLMaster 700 与基于 Scheimpflug 成像的生物测量仪 AL-Scan 在白内障患者中的重复性和一致性。
Eye Contact Lens. 2020 Jan;46(1):35-45. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000603.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal astigmatism agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography and Scheimpflug-Placido based optical biometers.扫频源光学相干断层扫描与基于Scheimpflug-Placido的光学生物测量仪之间的角膜散光一致性
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 6;45(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03435-3.
2
Loss values of style transfer from UBM to AS-OCT images for plateau iris classification.用于高原虹膜分类的从UBM到AS-OCT图像的风格迁移损失值。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82327-5.
3
Prevalence and clinical associations of relative anterior microphthalmos assessed with an optical biometer.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Cyclosporine 0.09% Treatment on Accuracy of Preoperative Biometry and Higher Order Aberrations in Dry Eye Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.0.09%环孢素治疗对白内障手术干眼患者术前生物测量准确性及高阶像差的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;15:3679-3686. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S325659. eCollection 2021.
2
Repeatability of automated measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and biometer and agreement with standard devices.新型眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪和生物测量仪的自动测量重复性及其与标准设备的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):983. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79674-4.
3
Intradevice Repeatability and Interdevice Agreement of Ocular Biometric Measurements: A Comparison of Two Swept-Source Anterior Segment OCT Devices.
使用光学生物测量仪评估相对前部小眼症的患病率及临床相关性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82246-5.
4
Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source optical coherence and dual Scheimpflug tomography devices in keratoconus eyes.在圆锥角膜眼中,扫频源光学相干和双 Scheimpflug 断层成像设备在前节测量中的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 17;14(1):24368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76031-7.
5
Distribution and Characteristics of Ocular Biometric Parameters among a Chinese Population: A Hospital-Based Study.中国人群眼部生物特征参数的分布及特征:一项基于医院的研究。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):2117-2131. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00716-x. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Parameters Performed with GalileiG6 and OCT Casia 2.使用Galilei G6和OCT Casia 2对角膜参数进行的比较分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;13(2):267. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020267.
眼生物测量的设备内重复性和设备间一致性:两种扫频源眼前节光学相干断层扫描设备的比较
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Aug 7;9(9):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.9.14. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Assessment of anterior segment measurements using a high-resolution imaging device.使用高分辨率成像设备评估眼前节测量值。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Sep;17(9):969-979. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1816463. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Repeatability of whole-cornea measurements using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer.使用新型扫频源光相干断层扫描仪测量全角膜的重复性。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1709-1719. doi: 10.1177/1120672120944022. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
6
Ocular biometric repeatability using a new high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer.使用新型高分辨率扫频源光相干断层扫描仪进行眼部生物测量的可重复性研究。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Jun;17(6):591-597. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1772050. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients.新型扫频源光学相干生物测量仪的临床评估,该仪器使用个体折射率测量白内障患者眼轴长度。
Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(1):11-23. doi: 10.1159/000496690. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
Comparison of Repeatability and Agreement between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Dual-Scheimpflug Topography.扫频光学生物测量与双Scheimpflug地形图之间的重复性和一致性比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1516395. doi: 10.1155/2017/1516395. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
9
Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.针对来自美国和中国患者的光学低相干干涉测量法和部分相干干涉测量法光学生物测量仪的多中心研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.041.
10
Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.一种新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术光学生物测量仪与一种时域光学相干断层扫描技术光学生物测量仪的临床比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;41(10):2224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.03.019.