• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[评估在2个基层医疗中心使用单剂量药物的影响]

[Assessment of the impact of the use single-dose medications in 2 primary care centres].

作者信息

Segú Tolsà Jose Luis, Rubio Dalmau Ana, Pérez López Sonia, Fernández Roure Jose Luis, Serrat Torres Josep, Modamio Charles Pilar, Mariño Hernández Eduardo

机构信息

Unidad de Farmacia Clínica y Farmacoterapia, Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2013 Nov;45(9):451-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2013.02.003
PMID:23643645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6985482/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the economical impact of using medications packaged in a single dose non-reusable container (Onedose(®)), compared to prescribing preparations in the usual multidose containers.

DESIGN

We performed a cost-minimization analysis from a prescribing center's perspective. The observational study design is retrospective and analyzes 23 products in prescriptions made between January and April 2012.

SETTING

Two Spanish Primary Care Centers located in the province of Barcelona. The first covered an urban area with a population of 24.500 people, and the second a semi-urban area with 10.000 people.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Each examined product was measured between January and April 2012 and extrapolated annually, based on the defined substitution scenarios results of total Euro savings in non-prescribed doses and price differences.

RESULTS

The Savings related to the substitution of the prescribed packaging presentations with Onedose(®) were 45.000 Euros (24%) in the months of analysis and 133.000 Euros annually, avoiding the use of 212.000 doses (14%) in the period analyzed and 669.000 doses annually.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of single dose non-reusable container packaging (Onedose(®)) in the analyzed health centers reduced prescription-related expenses without increasing dispensing costs, thus reducing the household stock of those medicines which are not objectively suitable to be used without a previous diagnosis.

摘要

目的

评估使用单剂量不可重复使用容器(Onedose(®))包装的药物相比于使用常规多剂量容器包装的药物所产生的经济影响。

设计

我们从处方中心的角度进行了成本最小化分析。该观察性研究设计为回顾性研究,分析了2012年1月至4月开出的处方中的23种产品。

地点

位于巴塞罗那省的两个西班牙初级保健中心。第一个覆盖了一个有24,500人口的市区,第二个覆盖了一个有10,000人口的半市区。

主要观察指标

在2012年1月至4月期间对每种被检查的产品进行测量,并根据未开出剂量的总欧元节省情况和价格差异的定义替代方案结果进行年度外推。

结果

在分析的几个月中,用Onedose(®)替代规定包装形式所节省的费用为45,000欧元(24%),每年节省133,000欧元,在所分析的期间避免使用212,000剂(14%),每年避免使用669,000剂。

结论

在所分析的医疗中心使用单剂量不可重复使用容器包装(Onedose(®))可降低与处方相关的费用,而不会增加配药成本,从而减少了那些未经事先诊断就不适合使用的药物的家庭库存。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of the impact of the use single-dose medications in 2 primary care centres].[评估在2个基层医疗中心使用单剂量药物的影响]
Aten Primaria. 2013 Nov;45(9):451-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Do doctors in dispensing practices with a financial conflict of interest prescribe more expensive drugs? A cross-sectional analysis of English primary care prescribing data.配药执业中存在财务利益冲突的医生是否会开出更昂贵的药物?对英国初级保健处方数据的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e026886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026886.
3
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
4
[Single dose administration in therapy of glaucoma. Comparison of costs with multiple dose].[青光眼治疗中的单剂量给药。与多剂量的成本比较]
Ophthalmologe. 1994 Oct;91(5):602-5.
5
Brand Medications and Medicare Part D: How Eye Care Providers' Prescribing Patterns Influence Costs.品牌药物和医疗保险部分 D:眼科护理提供者的处方模式如何影响成本。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
[Non-antiretroviral drugs uses among HIV-infected persons receiving antiretroviral therapy in Senegal: Costs and factors associated with prescription].[塞内加尔接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病毒感染者使用非抗逆转录病毒药物的情况:成本及与处方相关的因素]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Aug;65(4):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
[Differences between prescription and dispensing of generic medicines in primary care. When the exception is the rule].[基层医疗中通用名药物处方与调剂的差异。当例外成为常态时]
Gac Sanit. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):404-6. doi: 10.1157/13110445.
8
What drives the prescribing of growth hormone preparations in England? Prices versus patient preferences.是什么推动了在英国开具生长激素制剂?价格还是患者偏好?
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 11;7(4):e013730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013730.
9
Influence of body mass index on prescribing costs and potential cost savings of a weight management programme in primary care.体重指数对初级保健中体重管理计划的处方成本及潜在成本节约的影响。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Jul;13(3):158-66. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007140.
10
Assessment of utilization pattern of fixed dose drug combinations in primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare centers in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔初级、二级和三级医疗保健中心固定剂量复方药物使用模式评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Nov 2;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40360-017-0176-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Returned medicines in community pharmacies of Barcelona, Spain.西班牙巴塞罗那社区药房的退回药品。
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Jun;30(3):272-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9177-0. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
2
[Evaluation of the pilot program of medicine dispensation in customized doses in Galicia [Spain]].[西班牙加利西亚地区定制剂量药品配给试点项目评估]
Gac Sanit. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):18-23; discussion 23-4. doi: 10.1157/13099115.
3
[Do the patients medicate themselves correctly?].患者是否正确自行用药?
Aten Primaria. 1994 Mar 31;13(5):242-6.
4
[A study of 1548 family medicine cupboards in Granada, Spain (author's transl)].[西班牙格拉纳达地区1548个家庭药柜的研究(作者译)]
Med Clin (Barc). 1982;79(3):118-21.