Poudel Arjun, Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Izham, Mishra Pranaya, Palaian Subish
Research Associate, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Department of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Phulbari-11, Pokhara, Nepal.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Nov 2;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40360-017-0176-z.
Prescription practices, especially in South Asian countries, have come under investigation for quality. Although there have been no studies in Nepal that have analyzed the prescription pattern of FDCs for different levels of health care centers, several studies from Nepal and other countries in the region have revealed poor medicine use practices, including irrational use of fixed-dose drug combinations (FDCs). This research aimed at assessing the utilization pattern of FDCs among primary (PHC), secondary (SHC) and tertiary health care (THC) centers in Western region of Nepal.
A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at primary, secondary and tertiary health care centers in Western Nepal. One hundred prescriptions from each health care center were chosen through systematic random sampling. The International Network for Rational Use of Drug (INRUD) indicators were used to assess the rationality of prescribing. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. The alpha level used was 0.05.
At the PHC center, 206 medicines were prescribed, of which 20.0% were FDCs. Antimicrobials were the most prescribed FDCs (57.1%). The unit prices of all FDCs were below 100 Nepalese Price Rupees (NPRs). At the SHC center, 309 medicines were prescribed, and 30% were FDCs. Vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements were the most prescribed FDCs (25.8%). The costs of 63.5% of FDCs were below 100 NPRs. At the THC center, 33.5% of 270 medicines were FDCs. As at the SHC center, vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements were the most prescribed FDCs (40.6%). The costs of 50.5% of FDCs were below 100 NPRs.
FDCs were used extensively at different health care centers. The number of prescription in private centers, following established guidelines and the essential drug list (EDL), was much lower. The cost associated with the utilization of FDCs was higher in private sectors compared to public health care centers. In certain cases, the use of FDCs was questionable, and this study found a low use of essential medicines. Education to improve prescription practices at different healthcare levels is recommended.
处方行为,尤其是在南亚国家,已受到质量方面的调查。尽管尼泊尔尚未有研究分析不同级别医疗保健中心的固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)处方模式,但尼泊尔和该地区其他国家的多项研究显示用药行为不佳,包括固定剂量药物组合(FDC)的不合理使用。本研究旨在评估尼泊尔西部地区初级(PHC)、二级(SHC)和三级医疗保健(THC)中心的FDC使用模式。
在尼泊尔西部的初级、二级和三级医疗保健中心进行了一项横断面描述性研究。通过系统随机抽样从每个医疗保健中心选取100份处方。使用国际合理用药网络(INRUD)指标评估处方的合理性。应用了描述性和推断性统计。所用的α水平为0.05。
在初级卫生保健中心,共开出206种药物,其中20.0%为FDC。抗菌药物是最常开具的FDC(57.1%)。所有FDC的单价均低于100尼泊尔卢比(NPR)。在二级卫生保健中心,共开出309种药物,30%为FDC。维生素、矿物质和膳食补充剂是最常开具的FDC(25.8%)。63.5%的FDC成本低于100 NPR。在三级医疗保健中心,270种药物中有33.5%为FDC。与二级卫生保健中心一样,维生素、矿物质和膳食补充剂是最常开具的FDC(40.6%)。50.5%的FDC成本低于100 NPR。
FDC在不同医疗保健中心广泛使用。遵循既定指南和基本药物清单(EDL)的私立中心的处方数量要低得多。与公共医疗保健中心相比,私立部门使用FDC的相关成本更高。在某些情况下,FDC的使用存在疑问,并且本研究发现基本药物的使用较少。建议开展教育以改善不同医疗保健层面的处方行为。