Beran J
Katedra psychiatrie ILF, Praha.
Cesk Psychiatr. 1990 Apr;86(2):97-102.
In the first part the author summarizes views of 95 Czechoslovak psychiatrists as regards the position of psychotherapy in the Czechoslovak health services and the position as regards psychotherapeutic training. From the summary ensues that the number of specialized departments does not correspond to the needs of our health services and the author emphasizes the need of better organization of psychotherapy in practice. At present there are opportunities of training in psychotherapy in particular in the psychotherapeutic section of the Psychiatric Society of the Czech Medical Society and in the Institute for Postgraduate Medical and Pharmaceutical Training in Prague. Both alternatives comprise compulsory participation in psychotherapeutic training groups. To make psychotherapeutic training more available, the author informs in the subsequent part of the paper on the possibility of education and training of health workers in psychotherapy. In this connection the author emphasizes the selection of participants, the principles of group psychotherapy training and the demand of selection of experienced supervisors and tutors. Training in psychotherapy should be differentiated to make differently oriented programmes possible; e.g. the programme for specialists in psychotherapy and another programme for doctors working in clinical medical branches. Finally the author deals with the perspective problem of specialization examinations in psychotherapy and indicates problems associated with institutionalization of psychotherapy.
在第一部分中，作者总结了95位捷克斯洛伐克精神病学家对于心理治疗在捷克斯洛伐克医疗服务中的地位以及心理治疗培训地位的看法。从总结中可以看出，专科部门的数量与我们医疗服务的需求不相符，作者强调了在实践中更好地组织心理治疗的必要性。目前有心理治疗培训的机会，特别是在捷克医学协会精神病学学会的心理治疗部门以及布拉格的医学和药学研究生培训学院。这两种选择都包括强制参加心理治疗培训小组。为了使心理治疗培训更容易获得，作者在论文的后续部分介绍了对卫生工作者进行心理治疗教育和培训的可能性。在这方面，作者强调了参与者的选拔、团体心理治疗培训的原则以及选择经验丰富的督导和导师的要求。心理治疗培训应该有所区分，以便能够制定不同方向的课程；例如，心理治疗专家课程和临床医学分支工作的医生的另一门课程。最后，作者讨论了心理治疗专业化考试的未来问题，并指出了与心理治疗制度化相关的问题。
