Ellington David R, Polin Michael R, Szychowski Jeff M, Deng Luqin, Richter Holly E
Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1700 6th Avenue South, Suite 10382, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA,
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1733-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2103-1. Epub 2013 May 4.
Weight-loss has been demonstrated to result in an improvement in fecal incontinence (FI) severity; however, there is a paucity of data addressing the differential impact of FI on the quality of life (QOL) and results of diagnostic testing across BMI categories. We wished to evaluate symptom distress, QOL, and diagnostic testing parameters among normal, overweight, and obese women with fecal incontinence.
Women undergoing evaluation for FI between 2003 and 2012 were identified. Participants completed validated, symptom-specific distress, impact, and general QOL measures including the Modified Manchester Questionnaire (MMHQ), which includes the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and the mental and physical component summary scores, MCS and PCS, respectively, of the Short Form-12. Anorectal manometry measures were also included. Multivariate regression analyses were performed.
Participants included 407 women with a mean age ± SD of 56 ± 13. Multivariate analyses revealed no differences in symptom-specific distress and impact as measured by MMHQ, MCS, and PCS across BMI groups; however, obese women had increased resting and squeeze pressures compared with normal and overweight BMI women (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001; p = 0.007 and p = 0.004 respectively).
Obese women with FI did not have more general impact and symptom-specific distress and impact on quality of life compared with normal and overweight women. Obese women with FI had higher baseline anal resting and squeeze pressures suggesting a lower threshold to leakage with pressure increases.
已证实体重减轻可改善大便失禁(FI)的严重程度;然而,关于FI对不同体重指数(BMI)类别患者生活质量(QOL)及诊断测试结果的差异影响,相关数据较少。我们希望评估大便失禁的正常、超重及肥胖女性的症状困扰、生活质量及诊断测试参数。
确定2003年至2012年间接受FI评估的女性。参与者完成了经过验证的、针对特定症状的困扰、影响及一般生活质量测量,包括改良曼彻斯特问卷(MMHQ),其中包括大便失禁严重程度指数(FISI),以及简短形式-12问卷的心理和身体成分汇总得分,分别为MCS和PCS。还包括肛门直肠测压测量。进行多变量回归分析。
参与者包括407名女性,平均年龄±标准差为56±13岁。多变量分析显示,在BMI组间,通过MMHQ、MCS和PCS测量的特定症状困扰和影响无差异;然而,与正常和超重BMI女性相比,肥胖女性的静息压力和挤压压力增加(p<0.0001和p<0.0001;分别为p=0.007和p=0.004)。
与正常和超重女性相比,患有FI的肥胖女性对生活质量的总体影响和特定症状困扰及影响并无更多差异。患有FI的肥胖女性基线肛门静息压力和挤压压力较高,提示压力增加时漏便阈值较低。