Jelovsek John Eric, Chen Zhen, Markland Alayne D, Brubaker Linda, Dyer Keisha Y, Meikle Susie, Rahn David D, Siddiqui Nazeema Y, Tuteja Ashok, Barber Matthew D
From the *Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; †University of Michigan; Ann Arbor, MI; ‡Department of Veteran Affairs and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; §Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL; ∥University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA; ¶Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; #University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; **Duke University, Durham, NC; and ††Department of Veteran Affairs and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):342-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000078.
The objective of this study was to estimate the minimum important difference (MID) for the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI) scale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ) scale of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire (MMHQ).
We calculated the MIDs using anchor-based and distribution-based approaches from a multicenter prospective cohort study investigating adaptive behaviors among women receiving nonsurgical and surgical management for fecal incontinence (FI). Patient responses were primarily anchored using a Global Impression of Change scale. The MID was defined as the difference in mean change from baseline between those who indicated they were "a little better" and those who reported "no change" on the Global Impression of Change scale 3 months after treatment. The effect size and SE of measurement were the distribution methods used.
The mean changes (SD) in FISI, CRADI, CRAIQ, and MMHQ scores from baseline to 3 months after treatment were -8.8 (12.0), -52.7 (70.0), -60.6 (90.0), and -12.6 (19.2), respectively. The anchor-based MID estimates suggested by an improvement from no change to a little better were -3.6, -11.4 and -4.7, -18.1 and -8.0, and -3.2 for the FISI, CRADI (long and short version), CRAIQ (long and short version), and MMHQ, respectively. These data were supported by 2 distribution-based estimates.
The MID values for the FISI are -4, CRADI (full version, -11; short version, -5), CRAIQ (full version, -18; short version, -8), and MMHQ -3. Statistically significant improvements that meet these thresholds are likely to be clinically important.
本研究的目的是评估粪便失禁严重程度指数(FISI)、盆底功能障碍问卷的结直肠-肛门困扰量表(CRADI)、盆底功能影响问卷的结直肠-肛门影响问卷(CRAIQ)以及改良曼彻斯特健康问卷(MMHQ)的最小重要差异(MID)。
我们从一项多中心前瞻性队列研究中,采用基于锚定和基于分布的方法计算MID,该研究调查了接受非手术和手术治疗粪便失禁(FI)的女性的适应性行为。患者的回答主要通过总体变化印象量表进行锚定。MID定义为治疗3个月后,在总体变化印象量表上表示“稍好一些”的患者与报告“无变化”的患者之间,从基线开始的平均变化差异。效应量和测量标准误是所使用的分布方法。
从基线到治疗后3个月,FISI、CRADI、CRAIQ和MMHQ评分的平均变化(标准差)分别为-8.8(12.0)、-52.7(70.0)、-60.6(90.0)和-12.6(19.2)。基于锚定的MID估计表明,从无变化到稍好一些的改善,FISI、CRADI(长版和短版)、CRAIQ(长版和短版)和MMHQ分别为-3.6、-11.4和-4.7、-18.1和-8.0以及-3.2。这些数据得到了两种基于分布的估计的支持。
FISI的MID值为-4,CRADI(完整版,-11;短版,-5),CRAIQ(完整版,-18;短版,-8),MMHQ为-3。达到这些阈值的具有统计学意义的改善可能具有临床重要性。