• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

珍视不同的人类生命。

Valuing different human lives.

作者信息

Goodwin Geoffrey P, Landy Justin F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):778-803. doi: 10.1037/a0032796. Epub 2013 May 6.

DOI:10.1037/a0032796
PMID:23647311
Abstract

Do people think of the value of all human lives as equivalent irrespective of age? Affirmations of the equal value of all human lives are culturally prominent, yet much evidence points to the fact that the young are often prioritized over the old in life-and-death decision-making contexts. Studies 1-3 aimed to reconcile this tension by showing that although individuals are seen as more equal with respect to negative rights not to be harmed or killed (though not completely equal), they are seen as less equal with respect to positive rights to be aided or saved. Age exerts a large and systematic impact on decisions about who to save and about whose death is more tragic, suggesting that individuals are seen as possessing differing amounts of contingent value. These initial studies also yielded the novel finding that, although children are prioritized over adults, older children are often prioritized over younger children. Study 4 replicated this finding with a think-aloud methodology; the study showed that the preference for older children appears to be driven by their having had more invested in their lives, their better developed social relations, and their greater understanding of death. Studies 5a-5c demonstrated the independent causal effects of each of these variables on judgments of life's value. Finally, in Studies 6 and 7, mediation methods were used to show that older children's more meaningful social relations primarily explain the greater value of older than of younger children. These findings have implications for bioethics and medical policy.

摘要

人们是否认为所有人类生命的价值无论年龄大小都是等同的?宣称所有人类生命具有平等价值在文化中很突出,但大量证据表明,在生死决策情境中,年轻人往往比老年人更受优先考虑。研究1 - 3旨在调和这种矛盾,表明尽管在不被伤害或杀害的消极权利方面,个体被视为更平等(尽管并非完全平等),但在获得帮助或被拯救的积极权利方面,他们被视为不那么平等。年龄对关于拯救谁以及谁的死亡更悲惨的决策产生了巨大且系统的影响,这表明个体被视为拥有不同数量的偶然价值。这些初步研究还得出了一个新发现,即虽然儿童比成年人更受优先考虑,但年龄较大的儿童往往比年龄较小的儿童更受优先考虑。研究4采用出声思考法重复了这一发现;该研究表明,对年龄较大儿童的偏好似乎是由他们在生命中有更多投入、更好发展的社会关系以及对死亡有更深刻理解所驱动的。研究5a - 5c证明了这些变量中的每一个对生命价值判断的独立因果效应。最后,在研究6和7中,采用中介方法表明,年龄较大儿童更有意义的社会关系主要解释了年龄较大儿童比年龄较小儿童具有更大价值的原因。这些发现对生物伦理学和医疗政策具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Valuing different human lives.珍视不同的人类生命。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):778-803. doi: 10.1037/a0032796. Epub 2013 May 6.
2
Protection, participation and protection through participation: young people with intellectual disabilities and decision making in the family context.保护、参与和通过参与保护:有智力残疾的年轻人及其在家庭环境中的决策。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Nov;56(11):1076-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01649.x.
3
[A world tailored for children and the young. The children and the young around us and the child and the adolescent within each of us].一个为儿童和年轻人量身打造的世界。我们周围的儿童和年轻人以及我们每个人内心的儿童和青少年。
Minerva Pediatr. 2002 Dec;54(6):489-506.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
6
Saving lives versus life-years in rural Bangladesh: an ethical preferences approach.拯救生命与孟加拉国农村的生命年:一种伦理偏好方法。
Health Econ. 2011 Jun;20(6):723-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.1627.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
British adolescents' and young adults' understanding and reasoning about the religious and nonreligious rights of asylum-seeker youth.英国青少年对寻求庇护青年的宗教和非宗教权利的理解和推理。
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):1102-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01755.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
9
Motivation for social contact across the life span: a theory of socioemotional selectivity.毕生社会交往动机:社会情感选择性理论
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1992;40:209-54.
10
Decisional strategy determines whether frame influences treatment preferences for medical decisions.决策策略决定了框架是否会影响对医疗决策的治疗偏好。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):285-94. doi: 10.1037/a0021608.

引用本文的文献

1
What We Do When We Define Morality (And Why We Need to Do It).我们在定义道德时所做的事情(以及我们为何需要这样做)。
Psychol Inq. 2023;34(2):53-79. doi: 10.1080/1047840x.2023.2248854. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
2
Explicit discrimination and ingroup favoritism, but no implicit biases in hypothetical triage decisions during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间的假设分诊决策中,存在明确的歧视和内群体偏好,但没有隐含偏见。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50385-w.
3
Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment.
道德上可免除但社会上被排斥:通过辩护精神障碍来否认代理权。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 26;17(7):e0272061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272061. eCollection 2022.
4
Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment.道德上可免除但社会上被排斥:通过精神障碍的辩护否定代理权。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252586. eCollection 2021.
5
When do caregivers ignore the veil of ignorance? An empirical study on medical triage decision-making.当照顾者忽视无知之幕时会怎样?一项关于医疗分诊决策的实证研究。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Jun;24(2):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09992-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Stimulating Influenza Vaccination via Prosocial Motives.通过亲社会动机促进流感疫苗接种。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159780. eCollection 2016.
8
Understanding human - bat interactions in NSW, Australia: improving risk communication for prevention of Australian bat lyssavirus.了解澳大利亚新南威尔士州人与蝙蝠的相互作用:改善预防澳大利亚蝙蝠狂犬病病毒的风险沟通。
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jul 2;10:144. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-144.