Suppr超能文献

输卵管结扎术、子宫切除术与上皮性卵巢癌:新英格兰病例对照研究。

Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control Study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;133(10):2415-21. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28249. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

Abstract

Previous studies have observed that tubal ligation and hysterectomy are associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer; however, little is known about whether these associations vary by surgical characteristics, individual characteristics or tumor histology. We used logistic regression to examine tubal ligation, simple hysterectomy and hysterectomy with unilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control Study. Our primary analysis included 2,265 cases and 2,333 controls. Overall, tubal ligation was associated with a lower risk of epithelial ovarian cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.97], especially for endometrioid tumors (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69). The inverse association between tubal ligation and ovarian cancer risk was stronger for women who had undergone the procedure at the time of last delivery (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.84) rather than at a later time (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.15). Overall, simple hysterectomy was not associated with ovarian cancer risk (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.83-1.42), although it was associated with a nonsignificant decreased risk of ovarian cancer among women who underwent the procedure at age 45 or older (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.40-1.02) or within the last 10 years (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.38-1.13). Overall, women who had a hysterectomy with a unilateral oophorectomy had significantly lower risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.94). In summary, tubal ligation and hysterectomy with unilateral oophorectomy were inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk in a large population-based case-control study. Additional research is necessary to understand the potential biologic mechanisms by which these procedures may reduce ovarian cancer risk.

摘要

先前的研究表明,输卵管结扎术和子宫切除术与卵巢癌风险降低有关;然而,对于这些关联是否因手术特征、个体特征或肿瘤组织学而异,人们知之甚少。我们使用逻辑回归分析了新英格兰病例对照研究中输卵管结扎术、单纯子宫切除术和单侧卵巢切除术与上皮性卵巢癌风险的关系。我们的主要分析包括 2265 例病例和 2333 例对照。总体而言,输卵管结扎术与上皮性卵巢癌风险降低相关[比值比(OR)=0.82,95%置信区间(CI):0.68-0.97],尤其是子宫内膜样肿瘤(OR=0.45,95%CI:0.29-0.69)。对于最后一次分娩时接受该手术的女性,输卵管结扎术与卵巢癌风险之间的反比关系更强(OR=0.60,95%CI:0.42-0.84),而不是在稍后时间接受手术的女性(OR=0.93,95%CI:0.75-1.15)。总体而言,单纯子宫切除术与卵巢癌风险无关(OR:1.09,95%CI:0.83-1.42),尽管它与 45 岁或以上或最近 10 年内接受手术的女性的卵巢癌风险呈非显著降低相关(RR:0.64,95%CI:0.40-1.02)或(OR=0.65,95%CI:0.38-1.13)。总体而言,单侧卵巢切除术的子宫切除术女性患卵巢癌的风险显著降低(OR=0.65,95%CI:0.45-0.94)。总之,在一项大型基于人群的病例对照研究中,输卵管结扎术和单侧卵巢切除术与卵巢癌风险呈负相关。需要进一步的研究来了解这些手术降低卵巢癌风险的潜在生物学机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer.卵巢癌的流行病学及危险因素
Prz Menopauzalny. 2023 Jun;22(2):93-104. doi: 10.5114/pm.2023.128661. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference.卵巢癌证据审查会议执行摘要。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):179-195. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005211. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.预防上皮性卵巢癌。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):a038216. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038216.

本文引用的文献

6
Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.子宫内膜异位症与卵巢癌:一项系统综述
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:140310. doi: 10.5402/2011/140310. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
8
Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis.输卵管结扎术与卵巢癌风险:综述与荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):55-67. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq030. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
10
Ovarian cancer risk factors in African-American and white women.非裔美国女性和白人女性的卵巢癌风险因素。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Sep 1;170(5):598-606. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp176. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验