• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical student appraisal: searching on smartphones.医学生评价:手机检索
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Feb 6;4(1):53-60. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-10-CR-0047. Print 2013.
2
Medical student appraisal: electronic resources for inpatient pre-rounding.医学生评估:住院预查房的电子资源。
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Aug 28;4(3):403-18. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-05-R-0032. eCollection 2013.
3
App Use in Psychiatric Education: A Medical Student Survey.精神科教育中的应用程序使用情况:一项医学生调查。
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;41(1):68-70. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0630-z. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
The use of smartphone applications by urology trainees.泌尿外科住院医师对智能手机应用程序的使用。
Surgeon. 2015 Oct;13(5):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
5
Methodology of development and students' perceptions of a psychiatry educational smartphone application.一款精神科教育智能手机应用程序的开发方法及学生看法
Technol Health Care. 2014;22(6):847-55. doi: 10.3233/THC-140861.
6
Medical students and personal smartphones in the clinical environment: the impact on confidentiality of personal health information and professionalism.临床环境中的医学生与个人智能手机:对个人健康信息保密性和职业素养的影响
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 22;16(5):e132. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3138.
7
Smartphone, the New Learning Aid amongst Medical Students.智能手机,医学生的新型学习辅助工具。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):JC05-JC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/20948.9826. Epub 2017 May 1.
8
The Use of Smartphones in Different Phases of Medical School and its Relationship to Internet Addiction and Learning Approaches.智能手机在医学院不同阶段的使用情况及其与网络成瘾和学习方法的关系。
J Med Syst. 2018 Apr 26;42(6):106. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0958-x.
9
Predictors of students' self-reported adoption of a smartphone application for medical education in general practice.学生自我报告在全科医学教育中采用智能手机应用程序的预测因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 May 21;15:91. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0377-3.
10
Profile of Educational Technology Use by Medical Students and Evaluation of a New Mobile Application Designed for the Study of Human Physiology.医学生教育技术使用情况分析及人体生理学学习新移动应用程序评估
J Med Syst. 2019 Aug 27;43(10):313. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1438-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Physicians' information-seeking, appraising, and clinical decision-making practices for drug prescriptions: an exploratory study.医生开具药物处方时的信息寻求、评估及临床决策实践:一项探索性研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;113(3):224-232. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2025.2082. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Exploring associations between problematic technology-dependent behaviors, physical and mental health, sleep quality, and academic procrastination among medical students.探索医学生中存在问题的技术依赖行为、身心健康、睡眠质量和学业拖延之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23405-9.
3
Developing a Mobile Application-based System for Enhancing Medical Skill Training.开发一个基于移动应用程序的系统以加强医学技能培训。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2025 Jan 1;13(1):25-35. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.103650.2019. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Evaluation of Mobile Apps Used among Medical Students for Learning and Education: A Mixed-Method Concurrent Triangulation Approach.评估医学生用于学习和教育的移动应用程序:混合方法同步三角测量方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):717-726. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788332. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Online Resources Used by Medical Students, a Literature Review.医学生使用的在线资源:文献综述
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Jun 25;9:136. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000136.1. eCollection 2020.
6
Assessment of learning by students in dental medicine: case of the faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir (Tunisia).牙医学学生的学习评估:以蒙纳斯提尔牙医学院为例(突尼斯)。
Tunis Med. 2022;100(3):185-191.
7
Towards an Open Medical School without Checkerboards during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How to Flexibly Self-Manage General Surgery Practices in Hospitals?迈向新冠疫情期间无棋盘式限制的开放医学院:医院如何灵活自主管理普通外科业务?
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;9(6):743. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060743.
8
Mobile apps for detecting falsified and substandard drugs: A systematic review.移动应用程序用于检测假药和劣药:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246061. eCollection 2021.
9
Problematic Internet Use, Mental Health, and Sleep Quality among Medical Students: A Path-Analytic Model.医学生的问题性互联网使用、心理健康与睡眠质量:一种路径分析模型
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Mar 9;42(2):128-135. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_238_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
10
Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.临床信息检索的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1129-1140. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz065.

本文引用的文献

1
Distraction: an assessment of smartphone usage in health care work settings.分心:对医疗工作场所中智能手机使用情况的评估。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012;5:105-14. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S34813. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
Oncology information on the Internet.互联网上的肿瘤学信息。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 May;42(5):368-74. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys039. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
3
Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs.医疗专业人员在 ACGME 培训计划中使用智能手机应用程序。
J Med Syst. 2012 Oct;36(5):3135-9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines.移动糖尿病应用程序的特点:文献综述及与循证指南对比的当前应用程序分析
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 22;13(3):e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1874.
5
Shortcomings and challenges of information system adoption.信息系统采用的缺点与挑战。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Sep;29(3):397-412. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.05.010.
6
25 ways to use your smartphone. Physicians share their favorite uses and apps.使用智能手机的25种方法。医生们分享他们最喜欢的用途和应用程序。
Minn Med. 2011 Apr;94(4):22-9.
7
The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes.互联网对癌症治疗结果的影响。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Nov-Dec;53(6):356-71. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356.
8
The patient physician relationship in the Internet age: future prospects and the research agenda.互联网时代的医患关系:未来前景与研究议程。
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):E15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e15.

医学生评价:手机检索

Medical student appraisal: searching on smartphones.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Feb 6;4(1):53-60. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-10-CR-0047. Print 2013.

DOI:10.4338/ACI-2012-10-CR-0047
PMID:23650487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3644814/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rapidly growing industry for mobile medical applications provides numerous smartphone resources designed for healthcare professionals. However, not all applications are equally useful in addressing the questions of early medical trainees.

METHODS

Three popular, free, mobile healthcare applications were evaluated along with a Google(TM) web search on both Apple(TM) and Android(TM) devices. Six medical students at a large academic hospital evaluated each application for a one-week period while on various clinical rotations.

RESULTS

Google(TM) was the most frequently used search method and presented multimedia resources but was inefficient for obtaining clinical management information. Epocrates(TM) Pill ID feature was praised for its clinical utility. Medscape(TM) had the highest satisfaction of search and excelled through interactive educational features. Micromedex(TM) offered both FDA and off-label dosing for drugs.

DISCUSSION

Google(TM) was the preferred search method for questions related to basic disease processes and multimedia resources, but was inadequate for clinical management. Caution should also be exercised when using Google(TM) in front of patients. Medscape(TM) was the most appealing application due to a broad scope of content and educational features relevant to medical trainees. Students should also be cognizant of how mobile technology may be perceived by their evaluators to avoid false impressions.

摘要

背景

移动医疗应用行业发展迅速,为数众多的智能手机资源旨在为医疗保健专业人员提供服务。然而,并非所有应用程序都能同等有效地解决早期医学受训者的问题。

方法

在苹果(TM)和安卓(TM)设备上,我们评估了三个流行的、免费的移动医疗保健应用程序以及一个谷歌(TM)网络搜索。六名在大型学术医院的医学生在各种临床轮转期间,对每个应用程序进行了为期一周的评估。

结果

谷歌(TM)是最常用的搜索方法,提供多媒体资源,但在获取临床管理信息方面效率不高。Epocrates(TM)药丸 ID 功能因其临床实用性而受到称赞。Medscape(TM)的搜索满意度最高,其互动式教育功能也很出色。Micromedex(TM)提供了 FDA 和标签外药物剂量。

讨论

谷歌(TM)是与基本疾病过程和多媒体资源相关问题的首选搜索方法,但在临床管理方面却不够充分。在面对患者时,也应谨慎使用谷歌(TM)。Medscape(TM)是最吸引人的应用程序,因为它涵盖了广泛的内容和与医学受训者相关的教育功能。学生还应该意识到移动技术可能会被评估者如何感知,以避免产生错误印象。