ABO 血型与胰腺癌风险:上海的一项研究和荟萃分析。
ABO blood group and risk of pancreatic cancer: a study in Shanghai and meta-analysis.
机构信息
Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
出版信息
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun 15;177(12):1326-37. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws458. Epub 2013 May 6.
Studies over 5 decades have examined ABO blood groups and risk of pancreatic cancer in Western, Asian, and other populations, though no systematic review has been published. We studied data from 908 pancreatic cancer cases and 1,067 population controls collected during December 2006-January 2011 in urban Shanghai, China, and reviewed the literature for all studies of this association. Random-effects meta-analysis provided summary odds ratio estimates according to blood group and by populations endemic versus nonendemic for cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA)-positive Helicobacter pylori. In our Shanghai study, versus group O, only ABO group A was associated with risk (odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27, 2.03). In 24 pooled studies, group A showed increased risk in both CagA-nonendemic and -endemic populations (ORpooled = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.49). In nonendemic populations, groups B and AB were also associated with higher risk (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.64; and OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.85, respectively). However, in CagA-endemic populations, groups B and AB were not associated with risk (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.19; and OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.38, respectively). These population differences were significant. One explanation for contrasts in associations of blood groups B and AB between CagA-endemic and -nonendemic populations could involve gastric epithelial expression of A versus B antigens on colonization behaviors of CagA-positive and CagA-negative H. pylori strains.
超过 50 年的研究已经检查了 ABO 血型和胰腺癌风险在西方、亚洲和其他人群中的关系,尽管尚未发表系统综述。我们研究了 2006 年 12 月至 2011 年 1 月期间在中国上海市区采集的 908 例胰腺癌病例和 1067 例人群对照的数据,并对所有关于这种关联的研究进行了文献复习。根据血型和细胞毒素相关基因 A (CagA)阳性幽门螺杆菌流行与否的人群,采用随机效应荟萃分析提供了综合优势比估计值。在我们的上海研究中,与 O 组相比,只有 A 组与风险相关(比值比(OR)=1.60,95%置信区间(CI):1.27,2.03)。在 24 项汇总研究中,A 组在 CagA 非流行和流行人群中均显示出风险增加(ORpooled = 1.40,95% CI:1.32,1.49)。在非流行人群中,B 组和 AB 组也与更高的风险相关(OR = 1.38,95% CI:1.16,1.64;OR = 1.52,95% CI:1.24,1.85)。然而,在 CagA 流行人群中,B 组和 AB 组与风险无关(OR = 1.05,95% CI:0.92,1.19;OR = 1.13,95% CI:0.92,1.38)。这些人群差异具有统计学意义。B 组和 AB 组血型与 CagA 流行和非流行人群之间关联的差异可能与 CagA 阳性和 CagA 阴性幽门螺杆菌菌株定植行为中胃上皮细胞表达 A 抗原与 B 抗原有关。