• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外生命支持系统的植入时间可预测院外心脏骤停患者的死亡率。

Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Benekestrasse 2-8, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Sep;102(9):661-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0580-3. Epub 2013 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-013-0580-3
PMID:23657432
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify predictors of mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) undergoing in-hospital extracorporeal life support system (ECLS) treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the characteristics and clinical outcomes of 28 patients (January 2010 and December 2011) with OHCA and veno-arterial ECLS implemented during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) upon admission to the cath lab. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined after ECLS implantation and then every 24 h during and after successful weaning from ECLS.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day survival rate was 39.3 % (11 of 28 patients). Baseline characteristics, initial laboratory measurements, and LVEF on admission were not significantly different between survivors and non-survivors. There was no difference regarding median CPR duration [survivors 44.0 min (IQR 31.0-45.0) vs. non-survivors 53.0 min (IQR 40.0-61.3); P = 0.23]. Door-to-ECLS implantation time was significantly longer in non-survivors [42.5 min (IQR 28.0-56.5) vs. 25.0 min (IQR 21.0-30.0); P < 0.01]. ECLS treatment duration was not significantly different between the two groups [survivors: 4.0 days (IQR 1.5-7.5) vs. non-survivors 6.5 days (IQR 1.0-8.0); P = 0.69]. LVEF significantly improved in survivors during ECLS treatment (mean ± SD survivor 47.5 ± 14.7 % vs. non-survivor 23.3 ± 14.9 %; P < 0.01). The door-to-ECLS implantation time was the only significant and independent predictor of 30-day mortality in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a benefit favouring patients with a door-to-ECLS implantation time <30 min (log rank 6.29; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A door-to-ECLS implantation time <30 min significantly improves 30-day outcomes in patients with OHCA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定行院内体外生命支持系统(ECLS)治疗的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的死亡预测因素。

方法

我们回顾性研究了 28 例 OHCA 患者的特征和临床结局,这些患者于 2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间在入院至导管室期间接受持续心肺复苏(CPR)时进行了静脉-动脉 ECLS 治疗。在 ECLS 植入后确定左心室射血分数(LVEF)的基线水平,然后在成功脱机后每 24 小时进行一次。

结果

总体 30 天生存率为 39.3%(28 例患者中的 11 例)。幸存者和非幸存者之间的基线特征、初始实验室测量和入院时的 LVEF 没有显著差异。CPR 持续时间中位数[幸存者 44.0 分钟(IQR 31.0-45.0)与非幸存者 53.0 分钟(IQR 40.0-61.3);P=0.23]、门到 ECLS 植入时间在非幸存者中明显更长[42.5 分钟(IQR 28.0-56.5)与 25.0 分钟(IQR 21.0-30.0);P<0.01]。两组 ECLS 治疗持续时间无显著差异[幸存者:4.0 天(IQR 1.5-7.5)与非幸存者 6.5 天(IQR 1.0-8.0);P=0.69]。幸存者在 ECLS 治疗期间 LVEF 显著改善(均值±SD 幸存者 47.5±14.7%与非幸存者 23.3±14.9%;P<0.01)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,门到 ECLS 植入时间是 30 天死亡率的唯一显著和独立预测因素(P=0.04)。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,门到 ECLS 植入时间<30 分钟的患者 30 天预后明显改善(对数秩检验 6.29;P=0.01)。

结论

门到 ECLS 植入时间<30 分钟可显著改善 OHCA 患者的 30 天结局。

相似文献

1
Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.体外生命支持系统的植入时间可预测院外心脏骤停患者的死亡率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Sep;102(9):661-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0580-3. Epub 2013 May 9.
2
Clinical outcomes after rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后挽救性体外心肺复苏的临床结局
Emerg Med J. 2017 Feb;34(2):107-111. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204817. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
Extracorporeal life support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Should we still fight for? A single-centre, 5-year experience.体外生命支持用于难治性院外心脏骤停:我们仍应为之奋斗吗?一项单中心5年经验总结。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;204:70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.165. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
A 5-year experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support in non-postcardiotomy patients with cardiac arrest.5 年应用体外生命支持治疗非心脏术后心搏骤停患者的心肺复苏经验。
Resuscitation. 2012 Nov;83(11):1331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Extracorporeal life support as rescue strategy for out-of-hospital and emergency department cardiac arrest.体外生命支持作为院外及急诊科心脏骤停的抢救策略。
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
6
Prognostic Impact of No-Flow Time on 30-Day Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Who Received Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.体外心肺复苏治疗院外心脏骤停患者无血流时间对 30 天神经功能结局的预测影响。
Circ J. 2020 Jun 25;84(7):1097-1104. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1177. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Neurological outcomes and duration from cardiac arrest to the initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.院外心脏骤停患者体外膜肺氧合启动与心脏骤停至开始之间的神经系统结局和持续时间:一项回顾性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 16;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0440-7.
8
Percutaneous extracorporeal life support for patients in therapy refractory cardiogenic shock: initial results of an interdisciplinary team.经皮体外生命支持治疗难治性心源性休克患者:多学科团队的初步结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Mar;18(3):283-91. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt505. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
9
Ten-year outcomes of extracorporeal life support for in-hospital cardiac arrest at a tertiary center.三级中心院内心搏骤停体外生命支持的 10 年结果。
J Artif Organs. 2020 Dec;23(4):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s10047-020-01217-5. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
10
Extracorporeal life support and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a nationwide registry: A propensity score-matched analysis.一项全国性登记研究:体外生命支持与院外心脏骤停后的生存率——倾向评分匹配分析
Resuscitation. 2016 Feb;99:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of door to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on mortality and neurological outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest acute myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.对于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院外心脏骤停急性心肌梗死患者,从发病至开始体外心肺复苏的时间对死亡率和神经功能结局的影响。
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Oct 14;47:100473. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100473. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
The ABC (Age, Bystander, and Cardiogram) score for predicting neurological outcomes of cardiac arrests without pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation: A nationwide population-based study.用于预测无院前自主循环恢复的心脏骤停患者神经学预后的ABC(年龄、旁观者及心电图)评分:一项基于全国人群的研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 May 31;19:100673. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100673. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Post-resuscitation care and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide propensity score-matching analysis.院外心脏骤停复苏后的治疗和结局:全国倾向评分匹配分析。
Resuscitation. 2013 Aug;84(8):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.主动脉内球囊反搏支持用于伴心原性休克的心肌梗死。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
3
Emergency extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a hospital without on-site cardiac surgical facilities.
Comparison of smokers' mortality with non-smokers following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.院外心脏骤停后吸烟者与非吸烟者死亡率的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Apr 26;43(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00510-w.
4
Impact of center volume on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with out‑of‑hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated using extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study.体外心肺复苏复苏的院外心脏骤停成年患者中心脏量对院内死亡率的影响:SAVE-J II 研究的二次分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58808-y.
5
[Open questions with respect to extracorporeal circulatory support 2024].[关于2024年体外循环支持的开放性问题]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Jun;119(5):346-351. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01131-1. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Lessons learned from recent clinical trials.院外难治性心脏骤停的体外心肺复苏:近期临床试验的经验教训。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Feb 29;5(2):e13129. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13129. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Risk factors for bleeding complications in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study.院外心脏骤停后接受体外心肺复苏患者出血并发症的危险因素:SAVE-J II研究的二次分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 28;14(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01253-x.
8
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiac Arrest: Does Age Matter?体外膜肺氧合在心脏骤停中的应用:年龄是否重要?
Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;52(1):20-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006039. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
9
A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Investigating the Impact of Targeted Perfusion Parameters during Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital and Inhospital Cardiac Arrest.一项系统评价与荟萃分析研究,调查体外心肺复苏期间目标性灌注参数对院外和院内心脏骤停的影响。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2022 Sep;54(3):191-202. doi: 10.1182/ject-191-202.
10
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Establishment of a Sustainable Program.体外心肺复苏术:叙述性综述与可持续计划的建立。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 9;58(12):1815. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121815.
医院无现场心脏外科条件时的紧急体外膜肺氧合。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Jul 20;8(3):375-82. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I3A57.
4
A 5-year experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support in non-postcardiotomy patients with cardiac arrest.5 年应用体外生命支持治疗非心脏术后心搏骤停患者的心肺复苏经验。
Resuscitation. 2012 Nov;83(11):1331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Percutaneous circulatory support in a patient with cardiac arrest due to acute pulmonary embolism.急性肺栓塞致心脏骤停患者的经皮循环支持
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Dec;101(12):1017-20. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0481-x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
6
Emergency circulatory support in refractory cardiogenic shock patients in remote institutions: a pilot study (the cardiac-RESCUE program).偏远机构难治性心原性休克患者的紧急循环支持:一项试点研究(心脏复苏计划)。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jan;34(2):112-20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs081. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
7
Extracorporeal life support for cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest due to acute coronary syndrome.体外生命支持治疗因急性冠脉综合征导致的心源性休克或心脏骤停。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;94(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.032. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
8
Coronary versus carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure in a pig model of prolonged cardiac arrest treated by different modes of venoarterial ECMO and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation.在不同模式的静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合和主动脉内球囊反搏治疗的长时间心脏骤停猪模型中,冠状动脉与颈动脉血流及冠状动脉灌注压的比较
Crit Care. 2012 Dec 12;16(2):R50. doi: 10.1186/cc11254.
9
Peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system as salvage treatment of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock: preliminary outcome evaluation.外周体外膜肺氧合系统作为难治性心源性休克患者的挽救性治疗:初步结果评估。
Artif Organs. 2012 Mar;36(3):E53-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01423.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
10
The Modified Glasgow Outcome Score for the prediction of outcome in patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective clinical proof of concept study.改良格拉斯哥预后评分对心脏骤停后患者预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性临床概念验证研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jul;101(7):533-43. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0423-7. Epub 2012 Feb 10.