儿科心理学家使用依从性评估和干预措施。
Pediatric psychologist use of adherence assessments and interventions.
机构信息
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
出版信息
J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Jul;38(6):595-604. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst025. Epub 2013 May 8.
OBJECTIVE
To document current clinical practices for medical regimen adherence assessment and intervention in the field of pediatric psychology.
METHODS
113 members of the Society of Pediatric Psychology completed an anonymous online survey that assessed use of adherence assessments and interventions in clinical practice, barriers and facilitators to their use, and preferred resources for obtaining information on adherence assessments and interventions.
RESULTS
Respondents reported using a range of adherence assessment and intervention strategies, some of which are evidence-based. Barriers to implementing these clinical strategies included time constraints and lack of familiarity with available clinical tools. Respondents reported that education about effective clinical tools would facilitate their use of adherence assessments and interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Future research and clinical efforts in adherence should consider developing practical tools for clinical practice, making accessible resources to promote dissemination of these tools, and increase understanding of clinician implementation of adherence assessments and interventions.
目的
记录儿科心理学领域中医疗方案依从性评估和干预的当前临床实践。
方法
113 名儿科心理学学会成员完成了一项匿名在线调查，该调查评估了在临床实践中使用依从性评估和干预措施的情况、使用这些措施的障碍和促进因素，以及获取依从性评估和干预措施信息的首选资源。
结果
受访者报告使用了一系列依从性评估和干预策略，其中一些是基于证据的。实施这些临床策略的障碍包括时间限制和对可用临床工具的不熟悉。受访者报告说，关于有效临床工具的教育将有助于他们使用依从性评估和干预措施。
结论
未来关于依从性的研究和临床工作应考虑开发实用的临床工具，提供可访问的资源以促进这些工具的传播，并提高对临床医生实施依从性评估和干预措施的理解。
Zotero 插件