CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
CMAJ. 2009 Dec 8;181(12):E267-74. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081591. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
Preventive guidelines on cardiovascular risk management recommend lifestyle changes. Support for lifestyle changes may be a useful task for practice nurses, but the effect of such interventions in primary prevention is not clear. We examined the effect of involving patients in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management on lifestyle adherence and cardiovascular risk.
We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial in 25 practices that included 615 patients. The intervention consisted of nurse-led cardiovascular risk management, including risk assessment, risk communication, a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing. The control group received a minimal nurse-led intervention. The self-reported outcome measures at one year were smoking, alcohol use, diet and physical activity. Nurses assessed 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk after one year.
There were no significant differences between the intervention groups. The effect of the intervention on the consumption of vegetables and physical activity was small, and some differences were only significant for subgroups. The effects of the intervention on the intake of fat, fruit and alcohol and smoking were not significant. We found no effect between the groups for cardiovascular 10-year risk.
Nurse-led risk communication, use of a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing did not lead to relevant differences between the groups in terms of lifestyle changes or cardiovascular risk, despite significant within-group differences.
心血管风险管理的预防指南建议进行生活方式改变。支持生活方式的改变可能是执业护士的一项有用任务,但此类干预措施在一级预防中的效果尚不清楚。我们研究了让患者参与护士主导的心血管风险管理对生活方式依从性和心血管风险的影响。
我们在 25 家诊所进行了一项群组随机对照试验,共纳入 615 名患者。干预措施包括护士主导的心血管风险管理,包括风险评估、风险沟通、决策辅助和适应性动机访谈。对照组接受了最小化的护士主导干预。一年后,通过自我报告的方式评估吸烟、饮酒、饮食和身体活动情况。护士在一年后评估了十年的心血管死亡率风险。
干预组之间没有显著差异。干预对蔬菜摄入和身体活动的影响较小,有些差异仅在亚组中显著。干预对脂肪、水果和酒精摄入以及吸烟的影响不显著。我们未发现两组之间的心血管十年风险存在差异。
尽管组内差异显著,但护士主导的风险沟通、决策辅助和适应性动机访谈并没有导致组间在生活方式改变或心血管风险方面出现显著差异。