Donders Institute for Brain, Behavior and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Neuron. 2013 May 8;78(3):523-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.003.
Current theories propose that coherence of oscillatory brain activity in the gamma band (30-80 Hz) constitutes an avenue for communication among remote neural populations. However, reports documenting stimulus dependency and time variability of gamma frequency suggest that distant neuronal populations may, at any one time, operate at different frequencies precluding synchronization. To test this idea, we recorded from macaque V1 and V2 simultaneously while presenting gratings of varying contrast. Although gamma frequency increased with stimulus contrast in V1 and V2 (by ∼25 Hz), V1-V2 gamma coherence was maintained for all contrasts. Moreover, while gamma frequency fluctuated by ∼15 Hz during constant contrast stimulation, this fluctuation was highly correlated between V1 and V2. The strongest coherence connections showed a layer-specific pattern, matching feedforward anatomical connectivity. Hence, gamma coherence among remote populations can occur despite large stimulus-induced and time-dependent changes in gamma frequency, allowing communication through coherence to operate without a stimulus independent, fixed-frequency gamma channel.
目前的理论提出,伽马波段(30-80 Hz)的脑振荡活动的相干性构成了远程神经元群体之间通信的途径。然而,记录到刺激依赖性和伽马频率的时间可变性的报告表明,在任何时候,远程神经元群体可能以不同的频率运作,从而排除了同步的可能性。为了验证这一观点,我们同时记录了猕猴 V1 和 V2 的活动,同时呈现不同对比度的光栅。尽管 V1 和 V2 中的伽马频率随刺激对比度增加(增加约 25 Hz),但 V1-V2 伽马相干性在所有对比度下都保持不变。此外,虽然在恒定对比度刺激期间,伽马频率波动约 15 Hz,但这种波动在 V1 和 V2 之间高度相关。最强的相干连接显示出一种层特异性模式,与前馈解剖连接相匹配。因此,尽管伽马频率受到刺激诱导和时间依赖性的大变化,但远程群体之间的伽马相干性仍然可以发生,从而允许通过相干性进行通信,而无需具有独立于刺激的固定频率伽马通道。