Ashraf Anam, Raut Videsh V, Canty Stephen J, McLauchlan George J
Manchester Medical School, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Knee. 2013 Oct;20(5):324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 9.
We report a prospective blinded randomised trial of local infiltration versus femoral nerve block in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement (TKR), in accordance with the CONSORT statement 2010.
Fifty patients in a teaching hospital were consented for the study. The study arms were intraoperative local anaesthesia (150ml 0.2% ropivacaine/1ml 1:1000 adrenaline/30mg ketolorac) and femoral nerve block (30ml 0.2% ropivacaine) with a primary outcome of pain score at 4h post operatively. Secondary outcomes were pain at 2h, pain scores before and after physiotherapy on day one, total opiate administered, time to physiotherapy goals and length of stay. Randomisation was by sealed envelope. The assessor was blinded and the patients partially blinded to the intervention.
Ten patients were excluded, eight before randomisation. The trial is complete. Forty patients were analysed for the primary outcome measure. The local infiltration group had significantly lower pain scores at 4h post-operatively; mean [SD] score 2.1 [2.6] versus 6.8 [3.2], p<0.00001 and on post-operative day one prior to physiotherapy; mean score 2.4 [2.3] versus 4.4 [2.3], p<0.05. Total opiate use was also significantly lower in the local infiltration group; mean total 115 [50.3]mg versus 176.5 [103.5]mg, p<0.01. There was no difference in any other outcome. There were no harms as a result of either intervention.
Intraoperative local infiltration gives superior pain relief compared to single shot femoral nerve block over the first 24h following primary TKR and minimises post-operative opiate use.
根据2010年CONSORT声明,我们报告了一项在接受初次全膝关节置换术(TKR)的患者中比较局部浸润麻醉与股神经阻滞的前瞻性双盲随机试验。
一家教学医院的50名患者同意参与本研究。研究分组为术中局部麻醉(150ml 0.2%罗哌卡因/1ml 1:1000肾上腺素/30mg酮咯酸)和股神经阻滞(30ml 0.2%罗哌卡因),主要结局指标为术后4小时的疼痛评分。次要结局指标包括术后2小时的疼痛、术后第一天物理治疗前后的疼痛评分、阿片类药物总用量、达到物理治疗目标的时间以及住院时间。随机分组采用密封信封法。评估者对干预措施不知情,患者对干预措施部分不知情。
10名患者被排除,其中8名在随机分组前被排除。试验已完成。对40名患者进行了主要结局指标分析。局部浸润麻醉组术后4小时的疼痛评分显著更低;平均[标准差]评分为2.1[2.6],而股神经阻滞组为6.8[3.2],p<0.00001;在术后第一天物理治疗前,局部浸润麻醉组的平均评分为2.4[2.3],股神经阻滞组为4.4[2.3],p<0.05。局部浸润麻醉组的阿片类药物总用量也显著更低;平均总量为115[50.3]mg,股神经阻滞组为176.5[103.5]mg,p<0.01。其他结局指标无差异。两种干预措施均未造成伤害。
在初次全膝关节置换术后的头24小时内,术中局部浸润麻醉比单次股神经阻滞能提供更好的疼痛缓解,并使术后阿片类药物用量降至最低。