Liu Qiang, Wang Anli, Zhang Jixia
Department of International Painless Medical Center, Tianjin Stomatological Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tianjin Stomatological Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Feb;10(4):178. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-286.
Local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and femoral nerve block (FNB) are commonly used analgesia methods after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no definitive conclusion about which of these two analgesia modes is superior. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically evaluate the analgesic effects of LIA and FNB after TKA.
We used the terms "total knee replacement, knee replacement, total knee arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, local infiltration analgesia, periarticular infiltration, periarticular injection, intra-articular infiltration, intra-articular injection, peripheral nerve block, femoral nerve block" to search the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu databases. The search period was set from the date of establishment of the database to September 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and network meta-analysis was performed using Stata14.0 and RevMan 5.30 software.
Nine articles were included for analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with LIA and FNB, the difference in opioid use [mean difference (MD) -4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.26 to -1.45] was statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference between the static visual analogue score at 24 hours postoperatively (MD 0.20, 95% CI: -0.91 to 1.31), the visual analogue score for exercise visual analogy at 24 hours after surgery (MD 0.10, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.32), and the length of hospital stay (MD 0.05, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.50).
LIA and FNB have similar effects on pain relief after TKA, but LIA can reduce the use of analgesic drugs and is easy to operate. Therefore, LIA can be used as the priority analgesic method for patients with TKA. However, multi-center, large-sample, high-quality, randomized controlled trials are still needed for further verification.
局部浸润麻醉(LIA)和股神经阻滞(FNB)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后常用的镇痛方法。然而,这两种镇痛方式哪种更优尚无定论。因此,本研究旨在系统评价TKA后LIA和FNB的镇痛效果。
我们使用“全膝关节置换、膝关节置换、全膝关节成形术、膝关节成形术、局部浸润镇痛、关节周围浸润、关节周围注射、关节内浸润、关节内注射、周围神经阻滞、股神经阻滞”等术语检索了PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Embase、科学网、中国知网(CNKI)、万方和维普数据库。检索时间设定为从各数据库建立之日至2021年9月。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量,并使用Stata14.0和RevMan 5.30软件进行网状Meta分析。
纳入9篇文章进行分析。Meta分析结果显示,与LIA和FNB相比,阿片类药物使用差异[平均差(MD)-4.35,95%置信区间(CI):-7.26至-1.45]具有统计学意义。然而,术后24小时静态视觉模拟评分(MD 0.20,95%CI:-0.91至1.31)、术后24小时运动视觉模拟视觉模拟评分(MD 0.10,95%CI:-0.12至0.32)和住院时间(MD 0.05,95%CI:-0.40至0.50)之间无显著差异。
LIA和FNB对TKA后疼痛缓解的效果相似,但LIA可减少镇痛药的使用且操作简便。因此,LIA可作为TKA患者的优先镇痛方法。然而,仍需要多中心、大样本、高质量的随机对照试验进行进一步验证。