King's College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, London SE13QD, UK.
BMJ. 2013 May 10;346:f2827. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2827.
To estimate the relations between the organisation of stroke services, process measures of care quality, and 30 day mortality in patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke.
Prospective cohort study.
Hospitals (n=106) admitting patients with acute stroke in England and participating in the Stroke Improvement National Audit Programme and 2010 Sentinel Stroke Audit.
36,197 adults admitted with acute ischaemic stroke to a participating hospital from 1 April 2010 to 30 November 2011.
Associations between process of care (the assessments, interventions, and treatments that patients receive) and 30 day all cause mortality, adjusting for patient level characteristics. Process of care was measured using six individual measures of stroke care and summarised into an overall quality score.
Of 36,197 patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke, 25,904 (71.6%) were eligible to receive all six care processes. Patients admitted to stroke services with high organisational scores were more likely to receive most (5 or 6) of the six care processes. Three of the individual processes were associated with reduced mortality, including two care bundles: review by a stroke consultant within 24 hours of admission (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95%confidence interval 0.78 to 0.96), nutrition screening and formal swallow assessment within 72 hours (0.83, 0.72 to 0.96), and antiplatelet therapy and adequate fluid and nutrition for first the 72 hours (0.55, 0.49 to 0.61). Receipt of five or six care processes was associated with lower mortality compared with receipt of 0-4 in both multilevel (0.74, 0.66 to 0.83) and instrumental variable analyses (0.62, 0.46 to 0.83).
Patients admitted to stroke services with higher levels of organisation are more likely to receive high quality care as measured by audited process measures of acute stroke care. Those patients receiving high quality care have a reduced risk of death in the 30 days after stroke, adjusting for patient characteristics and controlling for selection bias.
评估卒中服务组织、护理质量过程指标与急性缺血性卒中患者 30 天死亡率之间的关系。
前瞻性队列研究。
英格兰参与卒中改善国家审计计划和 2010 年哨点卒中审计的卒中患者收治医院(n=106)。
2010 年 4 月 1 日至 11 月 30 日收治于参与医院的 36197 例急性缺血性卒中成年患者。
使用卒中护理的 6 项个体护理措施测量护理过程,并调整患者个体特征,评估该过程与 30 天全因死亡率之间的相关性。护理过程通过 6 项卒中护理个体措施和一项整体质量评分来衡量。
36197 例急性缺血性卒中患者中,25904 例(71.6%)符合接受全部 6 项护理过程的条件。高组织评分的卒中服务患者更有可能接受多数(5 项或 6 项)护理过程。3 项个体护理过程与死亡率降低相关,包括 2 项护理包:入院后 24 小时内接受卒中顾问审查(调整后比值比 0.86,95%置信区间 0.78 至 0.96),72 小时内进行营养筛查和正式吞咽评估(0.83,0.72 至 0.96),以及头 72 小时内接受抗血小板治疗和充足的液体及营养供应(0.55,0.49 至 0.61)。多水平分析(0.74,0.66 至 0.83)和工具变量分析(0.62,0.46 至 0.83)均显示,与接受 0 至 4 项护理过程相比,接受 5 项或 6 项护理过程的患者死亡率更低。
以急性卒中护理过程审核指标衡量,组织水平较高的卒中服务患者更有可能接受高质量护理。在调整患者特征并控制选择偏倚后,接受高质量护理的患者卒中后 30 天内死亡风险降低。