Suppr超能文献

促进注意力缺陷多动障碍照护的共享决策。

Shared decision-making to improve attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder care.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a shared decision-making intervention with parents of children newly diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

METHODS

Seven pediatricians participated in a pre/post open trial of decision aids for use before and during the office visit to discuss diagnosis and develop a treatment plan. Encounters pre- (n=21, control group) and post-intervention implementation (n=33, intervention group) were compared. We video-recorded encounters and surveyed parents.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, intervention group parents were more involved in shared decision-making (31.2 vs. 43.8 on OPTION score, p<0.01), more knowledgeable (6.4 vs. 8.1 questions correct, p<0.01), and less conflicted about treatment options (16.2 vs. 10.7 on decisional conflict total score, p=0.06). Visit duration was unchanged (41.0 vs. 41.6min, p=0.75). There were no significant differences in the median number of follow-up visits (0 vs. 1 visits, p=0.08), or the proportion of children with medication titration (62% vs. 76%, p=0.28), or parent-completed behavior rating scale to assess treatment response (24% vs. 39%, p=0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Our intervention increased shared decision-making with parents. Parents were better informed about treatment options without increasing visit duration.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Interventions are available to prepare parents for visits and enable physicians to elicit parent preferences and involvement in decision-making.

摘要

目的

研究一项针对儿童新诊断为注意力缺陷多动障碍的父母的共同决策干预的效果。

方法

7 名儿科医生参与了一项决策辅助工具的预/后开放试验,该工具在就诊前和就诊期间使用,以讨论诊断并制定治疗计划。比较了干预前(n=21,对照组)和干预后实施(n=33,干预组)的就诊。我们对就诊进行了视频记录并对家长进行了调查。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组的父母在共同决策方面更有参与感(选择项得分 31.2 分与 43.8 分,p<0.01),更有知识(正确回答问题 6.4 分与 8.1 分,p<0.01),对治疗方案的选择冲突较少(决策冲突总分 16.2 分与 10.7 分,p=0.06)。就诊时间不变(41.0 分钟与 41.6 分钟,p=0.75)。随访次数中位数无显著差异(0 次与 1 次就诊,p=0.08),或药物滴定的儿童比例(62%与 76%,p=0.28),或家长完成行为评定量表评估治疗反应的比例(24%与 39%,p=0.36)。

结论

我们的干预措施增加了与父母的共同决策。父母对治疗方案的了解更好,而就诊时间没有增加。

实践意义

有干预措施可以为家长就诊做准备,并使医生能够引出家长的偏好并让他们参与决策。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making to improve attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder care.促进注意力缺陷多动障碍照护的共享决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 10.

引用本文的文献

6
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial.胸痛选择决策辅助工具:一项随机试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):251-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964791. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验