• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PSA 筛查检出局限性前列腺癌的治疗:基于预后因素的获益与危害。

Treatment of local-regional prostate cancer detected by PSA screening: benefits and harms according to prognostic factors.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):1971-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.198. Epub 2013 May 14.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.198
PMID:23674085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3670486/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Men with screen-detected prostate cancer can choose to undergo immediate curative treatment or enter into an expectant management programme. We quantified how the benefits and harms of immediate treatment vary according to the prognostic factors of clinical T-stage, Gleason score, and patient age.

METHODS

A microsimulation model based on European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer data was used to predict the benefits and harms of immediate treatment versus delayed treatment of local-regional prostate cancer in men aged 55-74 years. Benefits included life-years gained and reduced probability of death from prostate cancer. Harms included lead time and probability of overdiagnosis.

RESULTS

The ratio of mean lead time to mean life-years gained ranged from 1.8 to 31.2, and the additional number of treatments required per prostate cancer death prevented ranged from 0.3 to 11.6 across the different prognostic groups. Both harm-benefit ratios were lowest, most favourable, for men aged 55-59 years and diagnosed with moderate-risk prostate cancer. Ratios were high for men aged 70-74 years regardless of clinical T-stage and Gleason score.

CONCLUSION

Men aged 55-59 years with moderate-risk prostate cancer are predicted to derive greatest benefit from immediate curative treatment. Immediate treatment is least favourable for men aged 70-74 years with either low-risk or high-risk prostate cancer.

摘要

背景

通过屏幕检测出患有前列腺癌的男性可以选择接受立即治愈性治疗或进入期待管理方案。我们量化了立即治疗的益处和危害如何根据临床 T 期、Gleason 评分和患者年龄的预后因素而变化。

方法

使用基于欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究数据的微模拟模型来预测 55-74 岁男性局部区域性前列腺癌的立即治疗与延迟治疗的益处和危害。益处包括获得的寿命年数和降低死于前列腺癌的概率。危害包括领先时间和过度诊断的概率。

结果

不同预后组的平均领先时间与平均寿命年数增益之比范围为 1.8 至 31.2,每预防一例前列腺癌死亡所需的额外治疗次数范围为 0.3 至 11.6。对于年龄在 55-59 岁且诊断为中度风险前列腺癌的男性,这两个危害-效益比均最低,最有利。无论临床 T 期和 Gleason 评分如何,年龄在 70-74 岁的男性的比值均较高。

结论

预计年龄在 55-59 岁且患有中度风险前列腺癌的男性将从立即治愈性治疗中获得最大益处。对于年龄在 70-74 岁且患有低危或高危前列腺癌的男性,立即治疗最不利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91dd/3670486/5a34c336ce0b/bjc2013198f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91dd/3670486/5a34c336ce0b/bjc2013198f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91dd/3670486/5a34c336ce0b/bjc2013198f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment of local-regional prostate cancer detected by PSA screening: benefits and harms according to prognostic factors.PSA 筛查检出局限性前列腺癌的治疗:基于预后因素的获益与危害。
Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):1971-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.198. Epub 2013 May 14.
2
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
3
Comparative effectiveness of alternative prostate-specific antigen--based prostate cancer screening strategies: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查策略的替代方案的比较效果:潜在获益和危害的模型估计。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):145-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00003.
4
Prognostic factors of prostate cancer mortality in a Finnish randomized screening trial.一项芬兰随机筛查试验中前列腺癌死亡率的预后因素
Int J Urol. 2018 Mar;25(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/iju.13508. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
Individualized estimates of overdiagnosis in screen-detected prostate cancer.个体化评估筛查检出前列腺癌的过度诊断。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Feb;106(2):djt367. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt367. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
7
Estimating the harms and benefits of prostate cancer screening as used in common practice versus recommended good practice: A microsimulation screening analysis.评估常规实践中与推荐的良好实践中使用的前列腺癌筛查的危害和益处:一项微观模拟筛查分析。
Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;122(21):3386-3393. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30192. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1914-1931. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3712.
9
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
10
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Early quality-of-life and psychological predictors of disease-free time and survival in localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌患者无病时间和生存的早期生活质量和心理预测因素。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):677-686. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2069-z. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
2
Effectiveness, cost-utility and implementation of a decision aid for patients with localised prostate cancer and their partners: study protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.局限性前列腺癌患者及其伴侣决策辅助工具的有效性、成本效益及实施:一项阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 15;7(9):e015154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015154.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.前列腺特异性抗原筛查对生活质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367(7):595-605. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201637.
2
To be screened or not to be screened? Modeling the consequences of PSA screening for the individual.是否进行筛查?为个体建模 PSA 筛查的后果。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):778-84. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.317. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
3
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.前列腺癌死亡率随访 11 年后。
Patients' perceptions of the negative effects following different prostate cancer treatments and the impact on psychological well-being: a nationwide survey.
患者对不同前列腺癌治疗后负面影响的认知及其对心理健康的影响:一项全国性调查。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Mar 28;116(7):864-873. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.30. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Risk perception and psychological morbidity in men at elevated risk for prostate cancer.前列腺癌高危男性的风险认知与心理疾病
Curr Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(6):e462-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2679.
5
Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.前列腺癌筛查的成本效益:一项基于欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机对照试验(ERSPC)数据的模拟研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 13;107(1):366. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju366. Print 2015 Jan.
6
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的过度诊断与过度治疗。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1046-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):981-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135.
4
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与早期前列腺癌的观察等待。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 5;364(18):1708-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011967.
5
Impact of comorbidity on survival among men with localized prostate cancer.合并症对局限性前列腺癌患者生存的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1335-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2330. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
6
Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.哥德堡随机人群前列腺癌筛查试验的死亡率结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):725-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70146-7. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
7
Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam.美国与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究-鹿特丹的前列腺特异性抗原筛查比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):352-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp533. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
8
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
9
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的提前期和过度诊断:方法及背景的重要性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
10
Gleason score, age and screening: modeling dedifferentiation in prostate cancer.格里森评分、年龄与筛查:前列腺癌去分化建模
Int J Cancer. 2006 Nov 15;119(10):2366-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22158.