• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prognostic and survival analysis of 837 Chinese colorectal cancer patients.837 例中国结直肠癌患者的预后和生存分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 7;19(17):2650-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2650.
2
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.转移淋巴结比率的预后意义:淋巴结比率可作为胃癌患者的预后指标。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct 4;16(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1504-5.
3
[Prognostic value of lymph node ratio staging system in stage III( rectal cancer following 30 Gy/10 f preoperative radiotherapy].[淋巴结比率分期系统在Ⅲ期直肠癌术前30Gy/10次放疗后的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;17(10):990-6.
4
[Metastatic lymph node ratio and outcome of surgical patients with stage III colorectal cancer].[转移性淋巴结比率与Ⅲ期结直肠癌手术患者的预后]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012 Nov;32(11):1663-6.
5
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: a Western-center analysis.胃癌中转移性淋巴结比率的预后意义:一项西方中心的分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02127-y.
6
[Effect of number of metastatic lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio on the prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after curative resection].[根治性切除术后食管胃交界腺癌患者转移淋巴结数量及转移淋巴结比率对预后的影响]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;36(2):141-6.
7
Lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic indicator in stage III colorectal cancer: especially for fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined.淋巴结比率作为Ⅲ期结直肠癌的独立预后指标:尤其适用于检查的淋巴结少于12个的情况。
Tumour Biol. 2014 Nov;35(11):11685-90. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2484-x. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in stage IV colorectal cancer patients who have undergone curative resection.接受根治性切除的IV期结直肠癌患者中淋巴结比率的预后意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1513-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4184-6. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
9
The effect of lymph node ratio on the surgical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.淋巴结比率对结直肠癌患者手术结局的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68576-4.
10
Lymph node ratio improves TNM and Astler-Coller's assessment of colorectal cancer prognosis: an analysis of 761 node positive cases.淋巴结比率可改善TNM及阿斯特勒-科勒对结直肠癌预后的评估:761例淋巴结阳性病例分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Oct;18(10):1824-36. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2591-4. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Competing risk and random survival forest models for predicting survival in post-resection elderly stage I-III colorectal cancer patients.用于预测I-III期老年结直肠癌患者术后生存情况的竞争风险和随机生存森林模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05824-1.
2
Risk factors, monitoring, and treatment strategies for early recurrence after rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术后早期复发的危险因素、监测及治疗策略
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):100232. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100232.
3
Age, frequency, and strategy optimization for organized colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis conducted in China for the years 2023-2038.有组织的结直肠癌筛查的年龄、频率和策略优化:2023年至2038年在中国进行的一项决策分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1596. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13319-x.
4
Constructing a nomogram to predict overall survival of colon cancer based on computed tomography characteristics and clinicopathological factors.基于计算机断层扫描特征和临床病理因素构建预测结肠癌总生存期的列线图。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):4104-4114. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i10.4104.
5
Mortality rate and predictors of colorectal cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚结直肠癌患者的死亡率及其预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12597-9.
6
Imaging segmentation mechanism for rectal tumors using improved U-Net.基于改进U-Net的直肠肿瘤图像分割机制
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01269-6.
7
Construction and validation of artificial intelligence pathomics models for predicting pathological staging in colorectal cancer: Using multimodal data and clinical variables.构建和验证人工智能病理组学模型以预测结直肠癌的病理分期:使用多模态数据和临床变量。
Cancer Med. 2024 Apr;13(7):e6947. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6947.
8
Clinical presentation, treatment patterns, and outcomes of colorectal cancer patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提克里安贝萨专科医院的结直肠癌患者的临床表现、治疗模式和结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Sep;6(9):e1869. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1869. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
9
A nomogram for predicting cause-specific mortality among patients with cecal carcinoma: a study based on SEER database.基于 SEER 数据库的盲肠癌患者特异性死亡率预测列线图:一项研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 23;23(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02802-7.
10
Survival rate of colorectal cancer in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中国结直肠癌的生存率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 3;13:1033154. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1033154. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2012.癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
2
Which is the most suitable classification for colorectal cancer, log odds, the number or the ratio of positive lymph nodes?对于结直肠癌,哪种分类方法最合适,对数优势比、阳性淋巴结数量还是阳性淋巴结比例?
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028937. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
3
Young-onset colorectal cancer: is it time to pay attention?青年结直肠癌:是时候予以关注了吗?
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13;172(3):287-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.602. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
4
Despite aggressive histopathology survival is not impaired in young patients with colorectal cancer : CRC in patients under 50 years of age.尽管采取了积极的组织病理学治疗策略,年轻的结直肠癌患者的生存率并未受到影响:50 岁以下结直肠癌患者。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;27(1):71-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1291-8. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
5
Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer between younger and elderly patients: an analysis of 322 patients from a single institution.老年与年轻结直肠癌患者的临床病理特征差异:单中心 322 例患者分析。
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):574-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.014. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
6
Factors predicting oncologic outcomes in patients with fewer than 12 lymph nodes retrieved after curative resection for colon cancer.预测结肠癌根治性切除术后淋巴结检出数<12 枚患者的肿瘤学结局的因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;105(2):125-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.22072. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
7
Survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer in central and northern Denmark, 1998-2009.丹麦中部和北部 1998-2009 年结肠癌和直肠癌患者的生存情况。
Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):27-34. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S20617. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
8
Impact on Prognosis of Lymph Node Micrometastasis and Isolated Tumor Cells in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.II期结直肠癌中淋巴结微转移和孤立肿瘤细胞对预后的影响
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Apr;27(2):71-7. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.71. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
9
Lymph node ratio as determined by the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system predicts survival in stage III colon cancer.第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统确定的淋巴结比率可预测 III 期结肠癌的生存情况。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;103(5):406-10. doi: 10.1002/jso.21830. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
10
Lymph node ratio is a powerful prognostic index in patients with stage III distal rectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study.淋巴结比率是 III 期远端直肠癌患者的一个强大预后指标:一项日本多中心研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jul;26(7):891-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1173-0. Epub 2011 Mar 12.

837 例中国结直肠癌患者的预后和生存分析。

Prognostic and survival analysis of 837 Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, 2 Hospital of Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 7;19(17):2650-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2650.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2650
PMID:23674872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3645383/
Abstract

AIM

To develop a prognostic model to predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Survival data of 837 CRC patients undergoing surgery between 1996 and 2006 were collected and analyzed by univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model to reveal the prognostic factors for CRC. All data were recorded using a standard data form and analyzed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States). Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log rank test was used to assess differences in survival. Univariate hazard ratios and significant and independent predictors of disease-specific survival and were identified by Cox proportional hazard analysis. The stepwise procedure was set to a threshold of 0.05. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The survival rate was 74% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The results of univariate analysis suggested age, preoperative obstruction, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level at diagnosis, status of resection, tumor size, histological grade, pathological type, lymphovascular invasion, invasion of adjacent organs, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging were positive prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Lymph node ratio (LNR) was also a strong prognostic factor in stage III CRC (P < 0.0001). We divided 341 stage III patients into three groups according to LNR values (LNR1, LNR ≤ 0.33, n = 211; LNR2, LNR 0.34-0.66, n = 76; and LNR3, LNR ≥ 0.67, n = 54). Univariate analysis showed a significant statistical difference in 3-year survival among these groups: LNR1, 73%; LNR2, 55%; and LNR3, 42% (P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis results showed that histological grade, depth of bowel wall invasion, and number of metastatic lymph nodes were the most important prognostic factors for CRC if we did not consider the interaction of the TNM staging system (P < 0.05). When the TNM staging was taken into account, histological grade lost its statistical significance, while the specific TNM staging system showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The overall survival of CRC patients has improved between 1996 and 2006. LNR is a powerful factor for estimating the survival of stage III CRC patients.

摘要

目的

建立预测结直肠癌(CRC)患者生存的预后模型。

方法

收集 1996 年至 2006 年间接受手术的 837 例 CRC 患者的生存数据,通过单因素分析和 Cox 比例风险回归模型进行分析,以揭示 CRC 的预后因素。所有数据均使用标准数据表记录,并使用 SPSS 版本 18.0(SPSS,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行分析。通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算生存曲线。采用对数秩检验评估生存差异。通过 Cox 比例风险分析确定疾病特异性生存的单因素风险比和显著且独立的预测因素。逐步程序的阈值设定为 0.05。定义 P < 0.05 为统计学意义。

结果

3 年生存率为 74%,5 年生存率为 68%。单因素分析结果表明,年龄、术前梗阻、诊断时血清癌胚抗原水平、切除状态、肿瘤大小、组织学分级、病理类型、脉管侵犯、邻近器官侵犯和肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分期是阳性预后因素(P < 0.05)。淋巴结比值(LNR)也是 III 期 CRC 的强预后因素(P < 0.0001)。我们根据 LNR 值将 341 例 III 期患者分为三组:LNR1,LNR ≤ 0.33,n = 211;LNR2,LNR 0.34-0.66,n = 76;LNR3,LNR ≥ 0.67,n = 54。单因素分析显示,这三组患者 3 年生存率有显著统计学差异:LNR1,73%;LNR2,55%;LNR3,42%(P < 0.0001)。多因素分析结果显示,如果不考虑 TNM 分期系统的相互作用,组织学分级、肠壁浸润深度和转移淋巴结数量是 CRC 最重要的预后因素(P < 0.05)。当考虑 TNM 分期时,组织学分级失去统计学意义,而特定的 TNM 分期系统显示出统计学差异(P < 0.0001)。

结论

1996 年至 2006 年间,CRC 患者的总体生存率有所提高。LNR 是评估 III 期 CRC 患者生存的有力因素。