Suppr超能文献

ACCORD COPD I 一年期扩展研究:两种剂量的每日两次阿地溴铵治疗 COPD 患者的安全性和疗效。

One-year extension study of ACCORD COPD I: safety and efficacy of two doses of twice-daily aclidinium bromide in patients with COPD.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

COPD. 2013 Aug;10(4):500-10. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2013.791809. Epub 2013 May 16.

Abstract

This was a 52-week, double-blind, extension study in which COPD patients previously treated with twice-daily (BID) aclidinium bromide 200 μg or 400 μg during a 12-week lead-in study (ACCORD COPD I) continued the same treatment, while patients previously receiving placebo were rerandomized (1:1) to aclidinium 200 μg or 400 μg BID. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of aclidinium treatment. Efficacy outcomes included bronchodilation, health status, and rescue medication use. A total of 467 patients completed the lead-in study and 291 patients consented to participate in the extension. At study end, the percentages of patients who reported a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) were similar for both treatments (200 μg, 77.4%; 400 μg, 73.7%). Incidence of anticholinergic TEAEs was low and similar for both treatments, with dry mouth reported in only 1 patient (400 μg). Cardiac TEAEs were reported by a similarly low percentage of patients (<5% for any event in any group) with no apparent dose dependence. Improvements from baseline in lung function were greatest for patients who received continuous aclidinium treatment and those who were rerandomized from placebo to aclidinium 400 μg; these improvements were generally sustained throughout the study. Health status and overall rescue medication use was improved from baseline for both treatments. The safety profile of twice-daily aclidinium and sustained improvements in lung function and health status throughout the 52-week extension study support its use as a long-term maintenance treatment for patients with COPD. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00970268).

摘要

这是一项为期 52 周、双盲、扩展研究,先前在为期 12 周的先导研究(ACCORD COPD I)中接受每日两次(BID)阿地溴铵 200μg 或 400μg 治疗的 COPD 患者继续接受相同的治疗,而先前接受安慰剂的患者被重新随机分配(1:1)接受阿地溴铵 200μg 或 400μg BID。该研究的主要目的是评估阿地溴铵治疗的长期安全性和耐受性。疗效结局包括支气管扩张、健康状况和急救药物使用。共有 467 名患者完成了先导研究,291 名患者同意参加扩展研究。研究结束时,报告治疗后出现不良事件(TEAE)的患者比例在两种治疗中相似(200μg,77.4%;400μg,73.7%)。两种治疗的抗胆碱能性 TEAE 发生率均较低,且相似,仅有 1 名患者(400μg)报告口干。心脏 TEAE 的报告比例也较低(任何组任何事件均<5%),且无明显的剂量依赖性。接受连续阿地溴铵治疗的患者和从安慰剂重新随机分配到阿地溴铵 400μg 的患者的肺功能改善最大;这些改善在整个研究中基本持续。两种治疗的健康状况和总体急救药物使用均从基线改善。阿地溴铵每日两次的安全性特征和肺功能以及健康状况在整个 52 周扩展研究中的持续改善支持其作为 COPD 患者的长期维持治疗。(临床试验注册号 NCT00970268)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验