• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

茚达特罗/格隆溴铵与茚达特罗用于中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的长期维持性支气管扩张:FLIGHT 3研究

Long-Term Maintenance Bronchodilation With Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate Versus Indacaterol in Moderate-to-Severe COPD Patients: The FLIGHT 3 Study.

作者信息

Ferguson Gary T, Taylor Angel Fowler, Thach Chau, Wang Qian, Schubert-Tennigkeit Agnes A, Patalano Francesco, Banerji Donald

机构信息

Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan-Farmington Hills.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Aug 18;3(4):716-728. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.4.2016.0131.

DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.3.4.2016.0131
PMID:28848898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5556955/
Abstract

The objective of the FLIGHT3 study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of indacaterol/glycopyrrolate* (IND/GLY) versus an active comparator, IND, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) over 52 weeks. FLIGHT3 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 52-week study. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to IND/GLY (27.5/15.6 or 27.5/31.2 µg twice daily [b.i.d.]) or IND (75 µg once daily [o.d.]), delivered via the Neohaler device. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of IND/GLY versus IND in terms of adverse event (AE)-reporting rates in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD over 52 weeks. The secondary objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of IND/GLY versus IND in terms of pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) and post-dose 1-h FEV over 52 weeks. A total of 85.2% patients completed the study treatment. The overall incidence of AEs (and SAEs) was similar between treatments. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and/or cardiovascular (CV) events were comparable between treatment groups. The rate of discontinuation of the study treatment due to AEs was lower for IND/GLY than IND. Improvements in pre-dose trough FEV and post-dose 1-h FEV were consistently superior with IND/GLY than with IND over 52 weeks, demonstrating long-term maintenance of lung function. IND/GLY demonstrated a favorable long-term safety and tolerability profile and provided effective bronchodilation, with maintenance of lung function over 52 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. These data support the safety and efficacy of IND/GLY as a treatment option for COPD. ClinTrials.gov identifier NCT01682863 *.

摘要

FLIGHT3研究的目的是在52周内,评估茚达特罗/格隆溴铵*(IND/GLY)与活性对照药IND相比,用于中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的长期安全性和有效性。FLIGHT3是一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、为期52周的研究。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受IND/GLY(27.5/15.6或27.5/31.2微克,每日两次[b.i.d.])或IND(75微克,每日一次[o.d.]),通过Neohaler装置给药。主要目的是根据中重度COPD患者在52周内的不良事件(AE)报告率,评估IND/GLY与IND相比的长期安全性和耐受性。次要目的是根据给药前1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)谷值和给药后1小时FEV,评估IND/GLY与IND相比在52周内的长期疗效。共有85.2%的患者完成了研究治疗。各治疗组之间AE(和严重不良事件[SAE])的总体发生率相似。主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和/或心血管(CV)事件在各治疗组之间相当。因AE导致研究治疗停药的发生率,IND/GLY低于IND。在52周内,IND/GLY给药前FEV谷值和给药后1小时FEV的改善始终优于IND,表明肺功能得到长期维持。IND/GLY显示出良好的长期安全性和耐受性,提供有效的支气管扩张作用,在中重度COPD患者中维持肺功能达52周。这些数据支持IND/GLY作为COPD治疗选择的安全性和有效性。临床试验.gov标识符NCT01682863 *

相似文献

1
Long-Term Maintenance Bronchodilation With Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate Versus Indacaterol in Moderate-to-Severe COPD Patients: The FLIGHT 3 Study.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵与茚达特罗用于中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的长期维持性支气管扩张:FLIGHT 3研究
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Aug 18;3(4):716-728. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.4.2016.0131.
2
Long-term safety of glycopyrrolate: A randomized study in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (GEM3).格隆溴铵的长期安全性:一项针对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随机研究(GEM3)。
Respir Med. 2016 Jun;115:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
3
Dual Bronchodilation with Indacaterol Maleate/Glycopyrronium Bromide Compared with Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe COPD: Results from Two Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Studies.马来酸茚达特罗/格隆溴铵双重支气管扩张作用与乌美溴铵/维兰特罗在中重度 COPD 患者中的比较:两项随机、对照、交叉研究结果。
Lung. 2017 Dec;195(6):739-747. doi: 10.1007/s00408-017-0055-9. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) Versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Chinese Cohort from the LANTERN Study.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(IND/GLY)与沙美特罗/氟替卡松在中国中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:来自LATTERN研究的中国队列
COPD. 2016 Dec;13(6):686-692. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2016.1182970. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
5
Efficacy and safety of the direct switch to indacaterol/glycopyrronium from salmeterol/fluticasone in non-frequently exacerbating COPD patients: The FLASH randomized controlled trial.在非频繁加重 COPD 患者中,从沙美特罗/氟替卡松直接转换为茚达特罗/格隆溴铵的疗效和安全性:FLASH 随机对照试验。
Respirology. 2018 Dec;23(12):1152-1159. doi: 10.1111/resp.13374. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
6
Effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium on ventilation and perfusion in COPD: a randomized trial.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵对 COPD 通气和灌注的影响:一项随机试验。
Respir Res. 2022 Feb 10;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01949-3.
7
Extrafine inhaled triple therapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRIBUTE): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.特布他林、布地奈德/福莫特罗和茚达特罗/格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRIBUTE)的随机对照双盲平行分组研究
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30206-X. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Effects of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (QVA149) on lung hyperinflation and physical activity in patients with moderate to severe COPD: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study (The MOVE Study).茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(QVA149)对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺过度充气和身体活动的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究(MOVE研究)
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Jun 14;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0256-7.
9
Efficacy and safety of indacaterol/glycopyrronium in Japanese patients with COPD: Pooled analysis of SHINE and ARISE.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵在日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:SHINE和ARISE的汇总分析
Respir Investig. 2016 Nov;54(6):428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2: Efficacy and Safety of QVA149 (Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate) versus Its Monocomponents and Placebo in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.FLIGHT1 和 FLIGHT2 研究:茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(QVA149)对比其单药成分和安慰剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1068-79. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1048OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与其他支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):4961-5010. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02234-x. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
2
Evidence-based management approaches for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A practice review.基于证据的管理方法用于严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者:实践综述。
Palliat Med. 2022 May;36(5):770-782. doi: 10.1177/02692163221079697. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Dual versus monotherapy with bronchodilators in GOLD group B COPD patients according to baseline FEV level: a patient-level pooled analysis of phase-3 randomized clinical trials.根据基线 FEV 水平,GOLD 组 B COPD 患者中支气管扩张剂双联治疗与单药治疗的比较:III 期随机临床试验的患者水平汇总分析。
Respir Res. 2021 Feb 12;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01648-5.
4
Dual Bronchodilator in the Era of Triple Therapy.三联疗法时代的双重支气管扩张剂。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Oct 28;15:2695-2705. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S273987. eCollection 2020.
5
Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的药物治疗。美国胸科学会临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):e56-e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0625ST.
6
Dual combination therapy versus long-acting bronchodilators alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.双重联合疗法与长效支气管扩张剂单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012620.pub2.
7
LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations in patients with COPD: a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用长效β2受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂固定剂量联合制剂的系统评价
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 4;13:3115-3130. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S170606. eCollection 2018.
8
Inhaled glycopyrrolate for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入用格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 12;13:1873-1888. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S162646. eCollection 2018.
9
Optimal Bronchodilation for COPD Patients: Are All Long-Acting β₂-Agonist/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists the Same?慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的最佳支气管扩张:所有长效β₂受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂都一样吗?
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018 Jul;81(3):198-215. doi: 10.4046/trd.2018.0040. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: Final Data for 2012.死亡:2012年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Aug 31;63(9):1-117.
2
FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2: Efficacy and Safety of QVA149 (Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate) versus Its Monocomponents and Placebo in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.FLIGHT1 和 FLIGHT2 研究:茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(QVA149)对比其单药成分和安慰剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1068-79. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1048OC.
3
Pooled safety analysis of the fixed-dose combination of indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149), its monocomponents, and tiotropium versus placebo in COPD patients.茚达特罗与格隆溴铵固定剂量复方制剂(QVA149)、其单一组分以及噻托溴铵与安慰剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的汇总安全性分析。
Respir Med. 2014 Oct;108(10):1498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
Safety and tolerability of once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol 125/25 mcg and umeclidinium 125 mcg in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.每日一次使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗125/25微克和乌美溴铵125微克治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的安全性和耐受性:一项52周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
Respir Res. 2014 Jul 11;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-78.
5
The clinical and economic impact of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cohort of hospitalized patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的临床和经济影响:一组住院患者
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 27;9(6):e101228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101228. eCollection 2014.
6
Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus single bronchodilator therapy: the SHINE study.QVA149 双重支气管扩张与单一支气管扩张剂治疗的比较:SHINE 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Dec;42(6):1484-94. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00200212. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
One-year extension study of ACCORD COPD I: safety and efficacy of two doses of twice-daily aclidinium bromide in patients with COPD.ACCORD COPD I 一年期扩展研究:两种剂量的每日两次阿地溴铵治疗 COPD 患者的安全性和疗效。
COPD. 2013 Aug;10(4):500-10. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2013.791809. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in relation to compliance with guidelines: a study in the primary care setting.慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关成本与指南依从性:初级保健环境中的一项研究。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2013 Jun;7(3):139-50. doi: 10.1177/1753465813484080. Epub 2013 May 7.
9
A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD.一种新型基于模型的方法用于确定 COPD 中溴化吡丙隆的剂量。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Dec 8;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-74.
10
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults--United States, 2011.成年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Nov 23;61(46):938-43.