Gattis Maurice N
School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
J Soc Serv Res. 2013 Jan 1;39(1):38-49. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2011.633814.
This study examined risk and protective outcomes by comparing homeless sexual minority youths to heterosexual homeless youths regarding family, peer behaviors, school, mental health (suicide risk and depression), stigma, discrimination, substance use, and sexual risk behaviors. Structured interviews (N = 147) were conducted with individuals ages 16-24 at three drop-in programs serving homeless youths in Toronto. Bivariate analyses indicated statistically significant differences between homeless sexual minorities (n=66) and their heterosexual counterparts (n=81) regarding all variables: family, peer behaviors, stigma, discrimination, mental health, substance use and sexual risk behaviors with the exception of school belonging. Specifically, homeless sexual minority youths fared more poorly (e.g. lower satisfaction with family communication, experienced more stigma, used more drugs and alcohol) than their heterosexual counterparts. Improving family communication may be a worthwhile intervention if the youths are still in contact with their families. Future research should focus on victimization in the context of multiple systems.
本研究通过比较无家可归的性少数青年与异性恋无家可归青年在家庭、同伴行为、学校、心理健康(自杀风险和抑郁)、耻辱感、歧视、物质使用和性风险行为等方面,考察了风险和保护结果。对多伦多三个为无家可归青年服务的临时救助项目中16至24岁的个体进行了结构化访谈(N = 147)。双变量分析表明,除了学校归属感外,在所有变量(家庭、同伴行为、耻辱感、歧视、心理健康、物质使用和性风险行为)方面,无家可归的性少数群体(n = 66)与其异性恋同龄人(n = 81)之间存在统计学上的显著差异。具体而言,无家可归的性少数青年比其异性恋同龄人情况更糟(例如,对家庭沟通的满意度较低、经历更多耻辱感、使用更多毒品和酒精)。如果这些青年仍与家人保持联系,改善家庭沟通可能是一项值得进行的干预措施。未来的研究应关注多重系统背景下的受害情况。