三十年保护历程中的时尚潮流、资金投入与遗忘 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Fads, funding, and forgetting in three decades of conservation.

作者信息

Redford Kent H, Padoch Christine, Sunderland Terry

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2013 Jun;27(3):437-8. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12071.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.12071

PMID:23692015

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Fads, funding, and forgetting in three decades of conservation.

Conserv Biol. 2013 Jun;27(3):437-8. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12071.

Conservation: dollars and sense.

Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):614-6. doi: 10.1038/437614a.

Conservation: mark of respect.

Nature. 2007 Jul 26;448(7152):402-3. doi: 10.1038/448402a.

Doing conservation by numbers.

Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):12. doi: 10.1038/442012a.

Conservation science: ground force.

Nature. 2007 Feb 1;445(7127):481-3. doi: 10.1038/445481a.

Nature: the many benefits of ecosystem services.

Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):749; author reply 750. doi: 10.1038/443749a.

The business of biodiversity.

Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):184-5. doi: 10.1038/466184a.

Forestry: A green investment.

Nature. 2009 Jan 8;457(7226):144-6. doi: 10.1038/457144a.

Misspent energy.

Nature. 2011 Jun 8;474(7350):128. doi: 10.1038/474128a.

Day of reckoning for Ecuador's biodiversity.

Nature. 2011 Jan 20;469(7330):267. doi: 10.1038/469267a.

引用本文的文献

An introduction to key ecological concepts, financial opportunities, and risks underpinning aspirations for nature positive.

Bioscience. 2024 Jul 31;74(7):450-466. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biae040. eCollection 2024 Jul.

'Nature positive' must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy.

Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;8(1):14-17. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2.

A global evaluation of the effectiveness of voluntary REDD+ projects at reducing deforestation and degradation in the moist tropics.

Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13970. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13970. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24492-24499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904027116. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

The Application of Wearable Technology to Quantify Health and Wellbeing Co-benefits From Urban Wetlands.

Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01840. eCollection 2019.

Digital technology and the conservation of nature.

Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):661-73. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1.

The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation.

Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):636-47. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0714-0.

Digital technology and human development: a charter for nature conservation.

Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):527-37. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0703-3.

Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods.

Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):7-13. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12607. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Fads, funding, and forgetting in three decades of conservation.

Conserv Biol. 2013 Jun;27(3):437-8. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12071.

Conservation: dollars and sense.

Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):614-6. doi: 10.1038/437614a.

Conservation: mark of respect.

Nature. 2007 Jul 26;448(7152):402-3. doi: 10.1038/448402a.

Doing conservation by numbers.

Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):12. doi: 10.1038/442012a.

Conservation science: ground force.

Nature. 2007 Feb 1;445(7127):481-3. doi: 10.1038/445481a.

Nature: the many benefits of ecosystem services.

Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):749; author reply 750. doi: 10.1038/443749a.

The business of biodiversity.

Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):184-5. doi: 10.1038/466184a.

Forestry: A green investment.

Nature. 2009 Jan 8;457(7226):144-6. doi: 10.1038/457144a.

Misspent energy.

Nature. 2011 Jun 8;474(7350):128. doi: 10.1038/474128a.

Day of reckoning for Ecuador's biodiversity.

Nature. 2011 Jan 20;469(7330):267. doi: 10.1038/469267a.

引用本文的文献

An introduction to key ecological concepts, financial opportunities, and risks underpinning aspirations for nature positive.

Bioscience. 2024 Jul 31;74(7):450-466. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biae040. eCollection 2024 Jul.

'Nature positive' must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy.

Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;8(1):14-17. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2.

A global evaluation of the effectiveness of voluntary REDD+ projects at reducing deforestation and degradation in the moist tropics.

Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13970. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13970. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24492-24499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904027116. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

The Application of Wearable Technology to Quantify Health and Wellbeing Co-benefits From Urban Wetlands.

Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01840. eCollection 2019.

Digital technology and the conservation of nature.

Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):661-73. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1.

The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation.

Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):636-47. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0714-0.

Digital technology and human development: a charter for nature conservation.

Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):527-37. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0703-3.

Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods.

Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):7-13. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12607. Epub 2015 Nov 2.