Rubin J, Case G, Bower J
Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jul;150(7):1429-31.
Rehabilitation was assessed in 70 patients undergoing continuous ambulatory (CAPD; n = 67) or cyclic (CCPD; n = 3) peritoneal dialysis and 76 patients undergoing home hemodialysis (HHD). In the CAPD/CCPD group, there were more blacks (83% vs 53%) and diabetics (24% vs 8%). If patients too infirm to work were excluded, no statistically significant differences were found between those working for gain and in school (19% for CAPD/CCPD vs 32% for HHD); homemakers (16% for CAPD/CCPD vs 28% for HHD); and those not working (66% for CAPD/CCPD vs 41% for HHD). Although the CAPD/CCPD group had less formal education (8.9 +/- 3.7 years vs 10.9 +/- 2.2 years for HHD), illiteracy rates were similar (CAPD/CCPD, 16%; HHD, 7%). If unemployable (elderly and debilitated) patients were excluded, full rehabilitation was excellent in both groups (57% for CAPD/CCPD vs 65% for HHD), despite the greater number of blacks and diabetics in the CAPD group.
对70例接受持续性非卧床腹膜透析（CAPD；n = 67）或间歇性腹膜透析（CCPD；n = 3）的患者以及76例接受家庭血液透析（HHD）的患者进行了康复评估。在CAPD/CCPD组中，黑人（83%对53%）和糖尿病患者（24%对8%）更多。如果排除身体过于虚弱无法工作的患者，在有收入工作和在校的患者中（CAPD/CCPD组为19%，HHD组为32%）、家庭主妇中（CAPD/CCPD组为16%，HHD组为28%）以及无工作的患者中（CAPD/CCPD组为66%，HHD组为41%），未发现统计学上的显著差异。尽管CAPD/CCPD组接受的正规教育较少（8.9±3.7年对HHD组的10.9±2.2年），但文盲率相似（CAPD/CCPD组为16%，HHD组为7%）。如果排除无法就业（老年人和体弱患者），两组的完全康复情况都很好（CAPD/CCPD组为57%，HHD组为65%），尽管CAPD组中的黑人和糖尿病患者较多。
