Suppr超能文献

大脑中动脉血流速度对下体正压的反应。

Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in response to lower body positive pressure.

作者信息

Perry Blake G, Schlader Zachary J, Raman Aaron, Cochrane Darryl J, Lucas Samuel J E, Mündel Toby

机构信息

School of Sport and Exercise, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Nov;33(6):483-8. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12046. Epub 2013 May 15.

Abstract

Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) has been used in the treatment of haemorrhagic shock and in offsetting g-force induced fluid shifts. However, the middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv) response to supine LBPP is unknown. Fifteen healthy volunteers (mean ± SD: age, 26 ± 5 year; body mass, 79 ± 10 kg; height, 174 ± 9 cm) completed 5 minutes of 20 and 40 mm Hg LBPP, in a randomized order, separated by 5 minutes rest (baseline). Beat-to-beat MCAv and blood pressure, partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PET CO2 ) and heart rate were recorded and presented as the change from the preceding baseline. All measures were similar between baseline periods (all P>0·30). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased by 7 ± 6 (8 ± 7%) and 13 ± 7 mm Hg (19 ± 11%) from baseline during 20 and 40 mm Hg (P<0·01), respectively. The greater MAP increase at 40 mm Hg (P<0·01 versus 20 mm Hg) was mediated via a greater increase in total peripheral resistance (P<0·01), with heart rate, cardiac output (Model flow) and PET CO2 remaining unchanged (all P>0·05) throughout. MCAv increased from baseline by 3 ± 4 cm s(-1) (5 ± 5%) during 20 mm Hg (P = 0·003), whilst no change (P = 0·18) was observed during 40 mm Hg. Our results indicate a divergent response, in that 20 mm Hg LBPP-induced modest increases in both MCAv and MAP, yet no change in MCAv was observed at the higher LBPP of 40 mm Hg despite a further increase in MAP.

摘要

下体正压(LBPP)已被用于治疗失血性休克以及抵消重力引起的体液转移。然而,大脑中动脉血流速度(MCAv)对仰卧位LBPP的反应尚不清楚。15名健康志愿者(平均±标准差:年龄,26±5岁;体重,79±10千克;身高,174±9厘米)以随机顺序完成了5分钟20毫米汞柱和40毫米汞柱的LBPP,两次测试间隔5分钟休息(基线)。逐搏记录MCAv、血压、呼气末二氧化碳分压(PET CO2)和心率,并表示为相对于前一基线的变化。各基线期的所有测量值均相似(所有P>0.30)。平均动脉压(MAP)在20毫米汞柱和40毫米汞柱时分别较基线升高7±6(8±7%)和13±7毫米汞柱(19±11%)(P<0.01)。40毫米汞柱时MAP升高幅度更大(与20毫米汞柱相比,P<0.01)是由总外周阻力的更大增加介导的(P<0.01),而心率、心输出量(模型流量)和PET CO2在整个过程中均保持不变(所有P>0.05)。MCAv在20毫米汞柱时较基线升高3±4厘米·秒-1(5±5%)(P = 0.003),而在40毫米汞柱时未观察到变化(P = 0.18)。我们的结果表明存在不同的反应,即20毫米汞柱的LBPP导致MCAv和MAP适度增加,但在40毫米汞柱的较高LBPP时,尽管MAP进一步升高,MCAv却未观察到变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验