本体感受神经肌肉促进法和静态拉伸对室内足球运动员最大自主收缩和肌肉肌电图活动的急性影响。
Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretching on maximal voluntary contraction and muscle electromyographical activity in indoor soccer players.
作者信息
Reis Erika da Fonseca Silva, Pereira Guilherme Borges, de Sousa Nuno Manuel Frade, Tibana Ramires Alsamir, Silva Mauro Fernando, Araujo Marcia, Gomes Italo, Prestes Jonato
机构信息
Graduation Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
出版信息
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Nov;33(6):418-22. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12047. Epub 2013 May 6.
The aim was to investigate and compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching (SS) on maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and muscle activation in indoor soccer players. Thirty-three young adult men were divided into two groups: (i) sedentary and (ii) trained. Each group completed three different experimental trials: SS, PNF and no stretching (NS). The MVC of knee extension was evaluated before and immediately after each condition along with electromyography from the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles of the dominant leg. PNF or SS techniques induced no decrease on MVC and muscle electromyographical activity in indoor soccer players (P>0·05). The electromyography of the RF and VL was lower after SS only in the sedentary group (P≤0·05). Short-duration PNF or SS has no effect on isometric MVC and muscle activity in indoor soccer players.
目的是研究并比较本体感觉神经肌肉促进法（PNF）和静态拉伸（SS）对室内足球运动员最大自主收缩（MVC）和肌肉激活的影响。33名年轻成年男性被分为两组：（i）久坐不动组和（ii）训练组。每组完成三项不同的实验试验：静态拉伸、本体感觉神经肌肉促进法和不进行拉伸（NS）。在每种情况之前和之后立即评估膝关节伸展的最大自主收缩，并记录优势腿股外侧肌（VL）和股直肌（RF）的肌电图。PNF或SS技术对室内足球运动员的最大自主收缩和肌肉肌电活动没有降低作用（P>0·05）。仅在久坐不动组中，静态拉伸后股直肌和股外侧肌的肌电图较低（P≤0·05）。短时间的PNF或SS对室内足球运动员的等长最大自主收缩和肌肉活动没有影响。
Zotero 插件