Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症伴发食管癌患者的心理理论缺陷。

Theory of mind deficits in patients with esophageal cancer combined with depression.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine-Neurology, Changzhou Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 21;19(19):2969-73. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2969.

Abstract

AIM

To characterize the two components of theory of mind (ToM) in patients with esophageal cancer combined with depression.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with esophageal cancer combined with depression (depressed group) and 62 normal controls (control group) were assessed using reading the mind in the eyes test, faux pas task, verbal fluency test, digit span test and WAIS IQ test. The depressed group was divided into two subgroups including psychotic depressed (PD) group (32 cases) and nonpsychotic depressed (NPD) group (33 cases). The clinical symptoms of patients were assessed using Beck depression inventory version II and brief psychiatric reacting scale (BPRS).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the depressed group and the control group on tasks involving ToM social perceptual components (mind reading: t = 7.39, P < 0.01) and tests involving ToM social cognitive components (faux pas questions: t = 13.75, P < 0.01), respectively. A significant difference was also found among the PD group, the NPD group and the control group on mind reading (F = 32.98, P < 0.01) and faux pas questions (χ² = 78.15, P < 0.01), respectively. The PD group and NPD group performed worse than normal group controls both on mind reading and faux pas questions (P < 0.05). The PD group performed significantly worse than the NPD group on tasks involving ToM (mind reading: F = 18.99, P < 0.01; faux pas questions: F = 36.01, P < 0.01). In the depressed group, there was a negative correlation between ToM performances and BPRS total score (mind reading: r = -0.35, P < 0.01; faux pas questions: r = -0.51, P < 0.01), and between ToM performances and hostile suspiciousness factor score (mind reading: r = -0.75, P < 0.01; faux pas questions: r = -0.73, P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The two components of ToM are both impaired in patients with esophageal cancer combined with depression. This indicates that there may be an association between ToM deficits and psychotic symptoms in clinical depression.

摘要

目的

分析伴有抑郁的食管癌患者心理理论(Theory of Mind,ToM)的两个成分。

方法

采用“读心测试”、“失礼任务”、“词语流畅性测试”、“数字广度测试”和“韦氏智力测试”对 65 例伴有抑郁的食管癌患者(抑郁组)和 62 例正常对照者(对照组)进行评估。抑郁组分为精神病性抑郁(psychotic depression,PD)组(32 例)和非精神病性抑郁(nonpsychotic depression,NPD)组(33 例)。采用贝克抑郁量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory version Ⅱ,BDI-Ⅱ)和简明精神病评定量表(brief psychiatric rating scale,BPRS)评估患者的临床症状。

结果

抑郁组在心理社会知觉成分任务(读心:t=7.39,P<0.01)和心理社会认知成分任务(失礼问题:t=13.75,P<0.01)上与对照组存在显著差异。PD 组、NPD 组与对照组在心理社会知觉成分任务(F=32.98,P<0.01)和心理社会认知成分任务(χ²=78.15,P<0.01)上也存在显著差异。PD 组和 NPD 组在心理社会知觉成分任务(读心:P<0.05)和心理社会认知成分任务(失礼问题:P<0.05)上的表现均显著差于正常对照组。PD 组在心理社会知觉成分任务(读心:F=18.99,P<0.01;失礼问题:F=36.01,P<0.01)和心理社会认知成分任务(F=18.99,P<0.01;失礼问题:F=36.01,P<0.01)上的表现均显著差于 NPD 组。在抑郁组中,ToM 表现与 BPRS 总分呈负相关(读心:r=-0.35,P<0.01;失礼问题:r=-0.51,P<0.01),与敌对猜疑因子得分呈负相关(读心:r=-0.75,P<0.01;失礼问题:r=-0.73,P<0.01)。

结论

伴有抑郁的食管癌患者的 ToM 两个成分均受损,提示在临床抑郁症中,ToM 缺陷可能与精神病性症状有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验