Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, United States.
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Oct 1;254:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.029. Epub 2013 May 24.
Although it is generally accepted that the medial temporal lobe (MTL) is critical for episodic memory, the contributions of cortical regions in the MTL, such as the perirhinal (PRc) and parahippocampal (PHc) cortices, remain unresolved. Recent studies have asserted that the PRc supports the processing of object and face information, whereas the PHc supports the processing of scene information. These findings have been used to characterize the PRc and PHc as being important for the memory of objects and scenes, respectively. However, these results are also consistent with the idea that these MTL regions are critical for the memory of stimuli that are processed as either items or contexts. It has been difficult to differentiate between these two accounts given that in most studies, item and context are operationalized as different types of memoranda (e.g., memory for objects compared to memory for background scenes). Here, we tested the extent to which different MTL regions are involved in the retrieval of item or context information when the material type is held constant. Participants encoded pairs of fractal images and were oriented to encode one fractal as an item and the other as a context. At test, they were cued with previously studied item or context fractals and asked to retrieve the corresponding associate. Results indicated that on test trials, PRc activity was increased during recall of fractals that were encoded as items, whereas PHc activity was greater during recall of fractals that were encoded as contexts. These results provide direct evidence that, even when stimulus type is held constant, the PRc and PHc are preferentially involved in supporting memory for item and context information, respectively.
虽然普遍认为内侧颞叶(MTL)对情景记忆至关重要,但 MTL 中的皮质区域(如旁嗅(PRc)和海马旁回(PHc)皮质)的贡献仍未解决。最近的研究断言,PRc 支持物体和面部信息的处理,而 PHc 支持场景信息的处理。这些发现被用来描述 PRc 和 PHc 分别对物体和场景记忆很重要。然而,这些结果也与这些 MTL 区域对于作为项目或上下文处理的刺激的记忆至关重要的观点一致。由于在大多数研究中,项目和上下文被操作化为不同类型的记忆(例如,与背景场景相比的物体记忆),因此很难区分这两种解释。在这里,我们测试了当材料类型保持不变时,不同的 MTL 区域在检索项目或上下文信息时的参与程度。参与者编码了一对分形图像,并被定向编码一个分形作为项目,另一个作为上下文。在测试时,他们被提示以前研究过的项目或上下文分形,并要求检索相应的联想。结果表明,在测试试验中,PRc 的活动在回忆编码为项目的分形时增加,而 PHc 的活动在回忆编码为上下文的分形时增加。这些结果提供了直接的证据,即使在保持刺激类型不变的情况下,PRc 和 PHc 也分别优先参与支持项目和上下文信息的记忆。