Stories we tell one another: narrative reflection and the art of oncology.

Storytelling is a deeply human act-ancient, universal, and familiar. But in this data-driven "Information Age," is there still room for narrative? As oncologists, we often feel overclocked, increasingly forced to microtask and live by the business world's mantra of "faster, cheaper, better," while our carefully honed humanistic clinical skills are coldly commoditized into Relative Value Units, our aptitude measured with tools that emphasize form over substance. In such an environment, can we still afford the inefficiency of anecdotes? Some might argue that we no longer need patient and physician narratives to inform care; instead, accurate molecular subtyping of tumors, good pharmaceutical agents, and rigorous clinical trial results are enough. Yet stories and reflections about being a doctor or being a patient remain important and instructive even in this era of molecular cancer medicine, even in the face of our increasing reliance on high-tech diagnostics and narrowly targeted smart therapeutics. Amid the pressures of rapidly changing practice patterns and the daily emotional challenges of working with seriously ill and dying patients, the acts of reflection and storytelling can also help keep us sane. Here I discuss the persistent importance of narrative in the context of the "Art of Oncology" forum of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.