• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术是局部晚期食管腺癌患者多模式治疗的重要组成部分。

Surgery is an essential component of multimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Aug;17(8):1359-69. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2223-4. Epub 2013 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-013-2223-4
PMID:23715646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4998180/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experience with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CXRT) has raised questions regarding the additional benefit of surgery after locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma patients achieve a clinical response to CXRT. We sought to quantify the value of surgery by comparing the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of trimodality-eligible patients treated with definitive CXRT vs. CXRT followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS

We identified 143 clinical stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma patients that were eligible for trimodality therapy. All patients successfully completed neoadjuvant CXRT and were considered appropriate candidates for resection. Patients that were medically inoperable were excluded. Cox regression models were used to identify significant predictors of survival.

RESULTS

Among the 143 patients eligible for surgery after completing CXRT, 114 underwent resection and 29 did not. Poorly differentiated tumors (HR = 2.041, 95% CI = 1.235-3.373) and surgical resection (HR = 0.504, 95% CI = 0.283-0.899) were the only independent predictors of OS. Patients treated with surgery had a 50 and 54 % risk reduction in overall and cancer-specific mortality, respectively. Median OS (41.2 vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.012) and DFS (21.5 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.007) were significantly improved with the addition of surgery compared to definitive CXRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery provides a significant survival benefit to trimodality-eligible esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with locally advanced disease.

摘要

背景

新辅助放化疗(CXRT)的经验引发了一些疑问,即对于局部晚期食管腺癌患者在对 CXRT 产生临床反应后,手术是否能带来额外获益。我们旨在通过比较接受根治性 CXRT 与 CXRT 后行切除术的局部晚期食管腺癌患者的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),来量化手术的价值。

方法

我们确定了 143 例符合三联疗法条件的临床 III 期食管腺癌患者。所有患者均成功完成新辅助 CXRT,且被认为适合进行手术切除。排除因身体原因无法手术的患者。采用 Cox 回归模型确定生存的显著预测因素。

结果

在完成 CXRT 后有手术适应证的 143 例患者中,114 例行切除术,29 例未行切除术。低分化肿瘤(HR=2.041,95%CI=1.235-3.373)和手术切除(HR=0.504,95%CI=0.283-0.899)是 OS 的唯一独立预测因素。接受手术治疗的患者,其全因和癌症特异性死亡率分别降低了 50%和 54%。与根治性 CXRT 相比,加用手术可显著改善 OS(41.2 个月与 20.3 个月,p=0.012)和 DFS(21.5 个月与 11.4 个月,p=0.007)。

结论

手术为局部晚期食管腺癌患者提供了显著的生存获益,这些患者符合三联疗法条件。

相似文献

1
Surgery is an essential component of multimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.手术是局部晚期食管腺癌患者多模式治疗的重要组成部分。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Aug;17(8):1359-69. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2223-4. Epub 2013 May 29.
2
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with improved overall survival in older patients with esophageal cancer.新辅助放化疗可改善老年食管癌患者的总生存。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Jan;9(1):40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
A retrospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced esophageal cancer.局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗方案的回顾性比较
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox025.
4
Utilization of surgery in trimodality-eligible patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma in a nonprotocol setting.在非方案设定中,对符合三联疗法条件的局部晚期食管腺癌患者进行手术治疗。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):708-15. doi: 10.1111/dote.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
5
Long-term Treatment Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.局部晚期食管癌的长期治疗结果:单机构经验
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;39(5):448-52. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000089.
6
Prognostic value of neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.新辅助治疗反应对局部晚期食管腺癌的预后价值。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;157(4):1682-1693.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.131. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
7
Refining pathological evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.优化新辅助治疗食管腺癌的病理评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 28;19(48):9282-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9282.
8
Survival in Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Trimodality Therapy Is Independent of Regional Lymph Node Location.接受三联疗法的食管腺癌患者的生存率与区域淋巴结位置无关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1075-80; Discussion 1080-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.063. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
9
Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Extramural Venous Invasion in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.局部晚期食管癌患者的腔外静脉侵犯的流行率和预后意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1588-1597. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6448-z. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性放化疗对比新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 II 期到 III 期食管鳞癌。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2710-2721.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.086. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of Surgery and Postoperative Outcomes in Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study in North India.鳞状细胞癌食管癌手术时机与术后结局:印度北部的一项前瞻性研究
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jan 14;56(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01150-3.
2
[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer : Implications for surgery].[食管癌新辅助治疗后的完全缓解:对手术的影响]
Chirurg. 2022 Feb;93(2):132-137. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01509-3. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
Post-Neoadjuvant Surveillance and Surgery as Needed Compared with Post-Neoadjuvant Surgery on Principle in Multimodal Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review.食管癌多模式治疗中按需进行新辅助治疗后的监测与手术与原则上新辅助治疗后手术的比较:一项范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;13(3):429. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030429.
4
Refusal of Local Therapy in Esophageal Cancer and Impact on Overall Survival.拒绝局部治疗食管癌及其对总生存的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):663-675. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08761-7. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
Reliability and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a retrospective study.新辅助放化疗后微创食管切除术的可靠性和安全性:一项回顾性研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 28;14(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0920-0.
6
Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Choice and Outcome of Two Different Treatment Options for Patients with Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.年龄和合并症对潜在可治愈食管癌患者两种不同治疗选择的选择和结果的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(4):986-995. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Introduction of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in a Community Teaching Hospital.社区教学医院中微创食管切除术的介绍
JSLS. 2017 Jan-Mar;21(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00099.
8
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Chemoradiation Prior to Esophagectomy: Impact on Rate of Complete Pathologic Response and Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients.食管癌切除术前新辅助化疗与放化疗的比较:对食管癌患者完全病理缓解率和生存率的影响
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Dec;11(12):2227-2237. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.07.031. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications.放化疗后临床III期患者切除标本中耐药性食管腺癌的分布:其临床意义
Oncology. 2015;89(2):65-9. doi: 10.1159/000371889. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Is the outcome of a salvage surgery for T4 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma really poor?T4期胸段食管鳞状细胞癌挽救性手术的结果真的很差吗?
World J Surg. 2014 Nov;38(11):2891-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2668-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophagectomy after chemoradiation: who and when to operate.放化疗后食管癌切除术:谁和何时手术。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Winter;24(4):288-93. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.10.005.
2
Utilization of surgery in trimodality-eligible patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma in a nonprotocol setting.在非方案设定中,对符合三联疗法条件的局部晚期食管腺癌患者进行手术治疗。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):708-15. doi: 10.1111/dote.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma.根治性放化疗失败后的食管腺癌挽救性切除术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1126-32; discussion 1132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.106. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
4
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.术前放化疗治疗食管或食管胃交界癌。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
5
Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999 through 2008.美国发病率呈上升趋势的癌症:1999 年至 2008 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):118-28. doi: 10.3322/caac.20141. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
Changes in age, stage distribution, and survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma over three decades in the United States.美国三十多年来食管腺癌患者的年龄、分期分布和生存变化。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1685-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2141-1. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma: an alternative to surgery?胸段食管腺癌的确定性放化疗:能否替代手术?
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun 15;105(8):761-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.22157. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
Effect of histologic subtype on treatment and outcomes for esophageal cancer in the United States.组织学亚型对美国食管癌治疗和结局的影响。
Cancer. 2012 Jul 1;118(13):3268-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26608. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
9
A Phase II study of a paclitaxel-based chemoradiation regimen with selective surgical salvage for resectable locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer: initial reporting of RTOG 0246.一项基于紫杉醇的放化疗方案联合选择性手术挽救治疗可切除局部晚期食管癌的 II 期研究:RTOG 0246 的初步报告。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1967-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.043. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
10
Improved outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer with the addition of surgical resection to chemoradiation therapy.手术切除联合放化疗可改善食管癌的治疗效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):551-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1314-7. Epub 2010 Sep 14.