Suppr超能文献

保守牙科与牙髓病科诊所的噪音水平

Sound levels in conservative dentistry and endodontics clinic.

作者信息

Dutta Arindam, Mala Kundabala, Acharya Shashi Rashmi

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Glasgow Dental Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2013 Mar;16(2):121-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.108188.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the sound levels generated in dental clinics of conservative dentistry and endodontics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A decibel-meter with digital readout was used to measure sound levels at different time intervals at the chairside and at the center of the clinic. Minimum and maximum readings during a 3 min interval were recorded.

RESULTS

In the post-graduate (PG) clinic, there was significant difference in noise levels between the chairside (66-81 dB[A]) and the center of the clinic (66-67 dB[A]) at certain times. In the under graduate (UG) clinic, noise levels with suction and either high/slow speed handpieces (67-80 dB[A]) were significantly higher than the center of clinic. Suction alone in the UG clinic (63-75 dB[A]) was significantly quieter than in the PG clinic (69-79 dB[A]).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Mean sound levels in the working clinics ranged from 63.0 dB[A] to 81.5 dB[A]. These are within the recommended range for dental equipment. (2) With suction and either low/high speed handpiece combination, the PG clinic was significantly noisier than the UG clinic at several time periods.

摘要

目的

评估保守牙科和牙髓病科牙科诊所产生的声级。

材料与方法

使用带数字读数的分贝计在诊所椅旁和中心的不同时间间隔测量声级。记录3分钟间隔内的最小和最大读数。

结果

在研究生(PG)诊所,在某些时候,椅旁(66 - 81 dB[A])和诊所中心(66 - 67 dB[A])的噪音水平存在显著差异。在本科(UG)诊所,使用吸引器和高速/低速手机时的噪音水平(67 - 80 dB[A])显著高于诊所中心。UG诊所仅使用吸引器时(63 - 75 dB[A])比PG诊所(69 - 79 dB[A])明显更安静。

结论

(1)工作诊所的平均声级范围为63.0 dB[A]至81.5 dB[A]。这些在牙科设备的推荐范围内。(2)在几个时间段内,PG诊所在使用吸引器和低速/高速手机组合时比UG诊所明显更嘈杂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35f/3659855/71152498faee/JCD-16-121-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验