• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沉迷于建构:科学的逆行?

Addicted to constructs: science in reverse?

出版信息

Addiction. 2013 Sep;108(9):1532-3. doi: 10.1111/add.12227. Epub 2013 May 30.

DOI:10.1111/add.12227
PMID:23718564
Abstract

Advancement in science requires clarity of constructs.Like other fields in behavioral science, addiction research is being held back by researchers' use of different terms to mean similar things (synonymy) and the same term to mean different things (polysemy). Journals can help researchers to stay focused on novel and significant research questions by challenging new terms introduced without adequate justification and requiring authors to be parsimonious in their use of terms. To support construct lucidity, new modes of thinking about research integration are needed to keep up with the aggregate of relevant research.

摘要

科学的进步需要概念的清晰。与行为科学的其他领域一样,由于研究人员使用不同的术语来表示相似的事物(同义词)和使用相同的术语来表示不同的事物(多义词),成瘾研究的进展受到了阻碍。期刊可以通过挑战没有充分理由引入的新术语,并要求作者在使用术语时保持简洁,来帮助研究人员专注于新颖和重要的研究问题。为了支持概念的明晰性,需要新的研究整合思维模式来跟上相关研究的总和。

相似文献

1
Addicted to constructs: science in reverse?沉迷于建构:科学的逆行?
Addiction. 2013 Sep;108(9):1532-3. doi: 10.1111/add.12227. Epub 2013 May 30.
2
Perspectives on behavioral and social science research on cancer screening.癌症筛查行为与社会科学研究的视角
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1118-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20503.
3
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估:资源有限的发展中国家为科学产出做出有效贡献的途径。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Nov;14(6):370-7.
4
Sun-downing and integration for the advancement of science and therapeutics: the National Institute on Substance Use Disorders (NISUD).日落与整合,促进科学与治疗学的发展:国家药物滥用研究所(NISUD)。
Addiction. 2010 Dec;105(12):2044-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03071.x.
5
Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: how overuse/misuse of the term 'cognition' and the neglect of affective controls in behavioral neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind.从神经学角度反思认知革命:行为神经科学中过度使用/误用“认知”一词以及忽视情感控制如何可能会延迟对脑-心智理解的进展。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):2026-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
6
Research productivity of Pakistan in medical sciences during the period 1996-2012.1996-2012 年巴基斯坦医学科学研究成果。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Nov;17(21):2839-46.
7
Integration of basic sciences into the predoctoral curriculum to study temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain.将基础科学融入博士前课程以研究颞下颌关节紊乱病和口面部疼痛。
J Orofac Pain. 2002;16(3):181-4.
8
The Society for the Study of Addiction (SSA).成瘾研究学会(SSA)。
Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):677-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00729.x.
9
Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.科学图谱分析刻画了生物医学研究中的 235 种偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1205-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
10
Addiction research centres and the nurturing of creativity. The Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research: social science alcohol and drug research in Denmark.成瘾研究中心与创造力的培养。酒精与毒品研究中心:丹麦的社会科学酒精与毒品研究。
Addiction. 2011 Dec;106(12):2072-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03152.x. Epub 2010 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychology's Questionable Research Fundamentals (QRFs): Key problems in quantitative psychology and psychological measurement beyond Questionable Research Practices (QRPs).心理学的可疑研究基础(QRFs):超越可疑研究行为(QRPs)的定量心理学和心理测量中的关键问题。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 25;16:1553028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1553028. eCollection 2025.
2
Conceptualisation of financial capability in adults with acquired cognitive impairment: A qualitative evidence synthesis.获得性认知障碍成人的金融能力概念化:一项定性证据综合分析
Clin Rehabil. 2025 Jul;39(7):849-871. doi: 10.1177/02692155251347766. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Measuring the menu, not the food: "psychometric" data may instead measure "lingometrics" (and miss its greatest potential).
衡量的是菜单,而非食物:“心理测量”数据或许反而衡量的是“语言测量”(并错失其最大潜力)。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 21;15:1308098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308098. eCollection 2024.
4
Unpacking organizational readiness for change: an updated systematic review and content analysis of assessments.解析组织变革准备度:评估的最新系统回顾和内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4926-z.
5
Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation.内部助力:对医疗保健相关实施中的倡导者的综合综述
SAGE Open Med. 2018 May 17;6:2050312118773261. doi: 10.1177/2050312118773261. eCollection 2018.
6
Developing a common framework for evaluating the implementation of genomic medicine interventions in clinical care: the IGNITE Network's Common Measures Working Group.制定一个评估基因组医学干预措施在临床护理中实施情况的通用框架:IGNITE 网络的通用措施工作组。
Genet Med. 2018 Jun;20(6):655-663. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.144. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research.传播与实施研究的组织理论
Implement Sci. 2017 May 12;12(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0592-x.
8
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies.AIMD——一个经过验证的、简化的干预框架,用于促进证据融入健康实践、系统和政策并将其整合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 4;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0314-8.
9
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.实施研究综合框架应用的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.
10
Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.基准对照试验——一个涵盖所有观察性有效性研究的新概念。
Ann Med. 2015 Jun;47(4):332-40. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1027255. Epub 2015 May 12.