Carleton University, Department of English Language & Literature, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6. Canada.
Bioethics. 2013 Jul;27(6):341-7. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12031. Epub 2013 May 30.
Working within the tradition of continental philosophy, this article argues in favour of a phenomenological understanding of language as a crucial component of bioethical inquiry. The authors challenge the 'commonsense' view of language, in which thinking appears as prior to speaking, and speech the straightforward vehicle of pre-existing thoughts. Drawing on Maurice Merleau-Ponty's (1908-1961) phenomenology of language, the authors claim that thinking takes place in and through the spoken word, in and through embodied language. This view resituates bioethics as a matter of bodies that speak. It also refigures the meaning of ethical self-reflexion, and in so doing offers an alternative view on reflexivity and critique. Referring to the Kantian critical tradition and its reception by Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, we advance a position we call 'critical ethical reflexivity'. We contend that Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of language offers valuable insight into ethical reflexivity and subject formation. Moreover, his understanding of language may foster new qualitative empirical research in bioethics, lead to more nuanced methods for interpreting personal narratives, and promote critical self-reflexion as necessary for bioethical inquiry.
本文在大陆哲学传统的框架内,主张将语言理解为现象学的一个重要组成部分,这对生物伦理学研究至关重要。本文挑战了语言的“常识”观点,即认为思维先于语言,语言是预先存在的思想的直接载体。本文借鉴了莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂(Maurice Merleau-Ponty,1908-1961)的语言现象学,认为思维发生在口语中,发生在身体化的语言中。这种观点将生物伦理学重新定位为涉及言语的身体的问题。它也重新塑造了伦理自我反思的意义,从而提供了对反思和批判的另一种看法。本文通过参考康德的批判传统及其在汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)和米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)那里的接受情况,提出了我们称之为“批判伦理反思”的立场。我们认为,梅洛-庞蒂的语言现象学为伦理反思和主体形成提供了有价值的见解。此外,他对语言的理解可能会促进生物伦理学中的新的定性实证研究,为解释个人叙事提供更细致的方法,并促进将自我批判反思作为生物伦理学研究的必要条件。