Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA.
Risk Anal. 2013 Oct;33(10):1899-907. doi: 10.1111/risa.12071. Epub 2013 May 29.
Much attention has been paid to the treatment of dependence and to the characterization of uncertainty and variability (including the issue of dependence among inputs) in performing risk assessments to avoid misleading results. However, with relatively little progress in communicating about the effects and implications of dependence, the effort involved in performing relatively sophisticated risk analyses (e.g., two-dimensional Monte Carlo analyses that separate variability from uncertainty) may be largely wasted, if the implications of those analyses are not clearly understood by decisionmakers. This article emphasizes that epistemic uncertainty can introduce dependence among related risks (e.g., risks to different individuals, or at different facilities), and illustrates the potential importance of such dependence in the context of two important types of decisions--evaluations of risk acceptability for a single technology, and comparisons of the risks for two or more technologies. We also present some preliminary ideas on how to communicate the effects of dependence to decisionmakers in a clear and easily comprehensible manner, and suggest future research directions in this area.
人们非常关注依赖关系的处理,并致力于描述在进行风险评估时的不确定性和变异性(包括输入之间的依赖关系问题),以避免产生误导性的结果。然而,在沟通依赖关系的影响和含义方面进展相对较少,如果决策者不清楚这些分析的含义,那么进行相对复杂的风险分析(例如,将变异性与不确定性分开的二维蒙特卡罗分析)可能会被浪费。本文强调了认知不确定性可能会在相关风险(例如,不同个体或不同设施的风险)之间引入依赖关系,并说明了在两种重要决策情况下这种依赖关系的潜在重要性,即对单个技术的风险可接受性进行评估,以及对两个或更多技术的风险进行比较。我们还提出了一些初步的想法,以便以清晰和易于理解的方式将依赖关系的影响传达给决策者,并提出了该领域未来的研究方向。