Gutfraind Alexander
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, United States.
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Jul 8;10:e2195. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2195. eCollection 2024.
Uncertainty poses a pervasive challenge in decision analysis and risk management. When the problem is poorly understood, probabilistic estimation exhibits high variability and bias. Analysts then utilize various strategies to find satisficing solutions, and these strategies can sometimes adequately address even highly complex problems. Previous literature proposed a hierarchy of uncertainty, but did not develop a quantitative score of analytical complexity.
In order to develop such a score, this study reviewed over 90 strategies to cope with uncertainty, including methods utilized by expert decision-makers such as engineers, military planners and others.
It found that many decision problems have pivotal properties that enable their solution despite uncertainty, including small action space, reversibility and others. The analytical complexity score of a problem could then be defined based on the availability of these properties.
不确定性在决策分析和风险管理中构成了普遍的挑战。当对问题理解不充分时,概率估计会表现出高度的变异性和偏差。分析人员随后会采用各种策略来寻找满意的解决方案,而这些策略有时甚至能充分解决高度复杂的问题。先前的文献提出了不确定性的层次结构,但并未开发出分析复杂性的定量评分。
为了开发这样一个评分,本研究回顾了90多种应对不确定性的策略,包括工程师、军事规划人员等专家决策者所使用的方法。
研究发现,许多决策问题具有关键属性,尽管存在不确定性,但仍能据此找到解决方案,包括行动空间小、可逆性等。然后可以根据这些属性的可用性来定义问题的分析复杂性评分。