• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼斯贝特和威尔逊的发现存在差距?对我们认知过程的第一人称访问。

A gap in Nisbett and Wilson's findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes.

机构信息

Institut Mines-Télécom (Télécom EM), 9, rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry, France.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):654-69. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004
PMID:23719334
Abstract

The well-known experiments of Nisbett and Wilson lead to the conclusion that we have no introspective access to our decision-making processes. Johansson et al. have recently developed an original protocol consisting in manipulating covertly the relationship between the subjects' intended choice and the outcome they were presented with: in 79.6% of cases, they do not detect the manipulation and provide an explanation of the choice they did not make, confirming the findings of Nisbett and Wilson. We have reproduced this protocol, while introducing for some choices an expert guidance to the description of this choice. The subjects who were assisted detected the manipulation in 80% of cases. Our experiment confirms Nisbett and Wilson's findings that we are usually unaware of our decision processes, but goes further by showing that we can access them through specific mental acts.

摘要

尼斯贝特和威尔逊的著名实验得出的结论是,我们无法内省地了解自己的决策过程。约翰森等人最近开发了一种原始的协议,该协议包括秘密操纵主体的预期选择与他们所呈现的结果之间的关系:在 79.6%的情况下,他们没有察觉到这种操纵,并对他们没有做出的选择进行了解释,这证实了尼斯贝特和威尔逊的发现。我们复制了这个协议,同时为一些选择引入了专家指导,以描述这个选择。在 80%的情况下,接受帮助的实验对象察觉到了这种操纵。我们的实验证实了尼斯贝特和威尔逊的发现,即我们通常无法意识到自己的决策过程,但更进一步表明,我们可以通过特定的心理行为来了解它们。

相似文献

1
A gap in Nisbett and Wilson's findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes.尼斯贝特和威尔逊的发现存在差距?对我们认知过程的第一人称访问。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):654-69. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004.
2
Interactively guided introspection is getting science closer to an effective consciousness meter.交互式引导内省正在使科学更接近有效的意识测量仪。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.004.
3
How something can be said about telling more than we can know: on choice blindness and introspection.关于说出的内容超出我们所知的情况:论选择盲视与内省。
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):673-92; discussion 693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
4
Consciousness meets neuroeconomics: what is the value of stimulus awareness in decision making?意识与神经经济学相遇:刺激意识在决策中的价值是什么?
Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):525-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.003.
5
Introspection: the tipping point.
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):670-1. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.005.
6
Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.换个角度思考:无意识思维在偏好形成与决策中的优势。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):586-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586.
7
The relationship between semantic access and introspective awareness.语义通达与内省意识之间的关系。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Jun;123:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
[Decision-making and schizophrenia].[决策与精神分裂症]
Encephale. 2011 Dec;37 Suppl 2:S110-6. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(11)70036-7.
9
Brain signals do not demonstrate unconscious decision making: an interpretation based on graded conscious awareness.脑信号并未显示无意识决策:基于分级意识觉知的一种解读
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Feb;24:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
10
Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain.人类大脑中自由决策的无意识决定因素。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):543-5. doi: 10.1038/nn.2112. Epub 2008 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience.深度计算神经现象学:一种用于探究体验方式的方法框架。
Neurosci Conscious. 2025 Aug 5;2025(1):niaf016. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaf016. eCollection 2025.
2
Invisible Gorillas in the Mind: Internal Inattentional Blindness and the Prospect of Introspection Training.大脑中的隐形大猩猩:内源性无意视盲与内省训练的前景
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Apr 22;9:606-634. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00204. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring 5-MeO-DMT as a pharmacological model for deconstructed consciousness.
探索5-甲氧基二甲基色胺作为解构意识的药理学模型。
Neurosci Conscious. 2025 Apr 19;2025(1):niaf007. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaf007. eCollection 2025.
4
Being Well Together: Individual Subjective and Community Wellbeing.共同健康:个体主观幸福感与社区福祉
J Happiness Stud. 2020 Jun;21(5):1903-1921. doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00146-2. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
5
Suspending the Embodied Self in Meditation Attenuates Beta Oscillations in the Posterior Medial Cortex.冥想中悬置具身自我会减弱后内侧前额叶皮质中的β振荡。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 26;44(26):e1182232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1182-23.2024.
6
The phenomenology of attentional control: a first-person approach to contemplative science and the issue of free will.注意力控制的现象学:一种对沉思科学和自由意志问题的第一人称视角方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 12;15:1349826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349826. eCollection 2024.
7
Complex cognition and individual variability: a mixed methods study of the relationship between creativity and executive control.复杂认知与个体差异:创造力与执行控制关系的混合方法研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 22;14:1191893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191893. eCollection 2023.
8
Combatting negative bias: a mental contrasting and implementation intentions online intervention to increase help-seeking among individuals with elevated depressive symptomatology.对抗消极偏见:一种心理对比与实施意图在线干预措施,以增加抑郁症状较高个体的求助行为。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1145969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145969. eCollection 2023.
9
Tell Us What You Really Think: A Think Aloud Protocol Analysis of the Verbal Cognitive Reflection Test.告诉我们你的真实想法:言语认知反思测试的有声思维协议分析
J Intell. 2023 Apr 21;11(4):76. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040076.
10
The lived experience of remembering a 'good' interview: Micro-phenomenology applied to itself.回忆一次“良好”面试的鲜活经历:将微观现象学应用于其自身。
Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2023;22(1):217-245. doi: 10.1007/s11097-022-09844-4. Epub 2022 Sep 10.