• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's provisions regarding medical loss ratios and quality: evidence from Texas.

作者信息

Quast Troy

机构信息

Department of Economics and International Business at Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 2013 Fall;40(1):1-10.

PMID:24199516
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) includes a provision that penalizes insurance companies if their Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) falls below a specified threshold. The MLR is roughly measured as the ratio of health care expenses to premiums paid by enrollees. I investigate whether there is a relationship between MLRs and the quality of care provided by insurance companies.

METHODS

I employ a ten-year sample of market-level financial data and quality variables for Texas insurers, as well as relevant control variables, in regression analyses that utilize insurer and market fixed effects.

RESULTS

Of the 15 quality measures, only one has a statistically significant relationship with the MLR. For this measure, the relationship is negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the MLR provision may provide incentives for insurance companies to lower premiums, this sample does not suggest that there is likely to be a beneficial effect on quality.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's provisions regarding medical loss ratios and quality: evidence from Texas.
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Fall;40(1):1-10.
2
How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?平价医疗法案的医疗损失率规定如何影响保险公司的行为?
Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):370-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000091.
3
Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?医疗损失率是否是医疗保险个人市场监管的一个良好目标衡量指标?
Health Econ. 2015 Jan;24(1):55-74. doi: 10.1002/hec.3002. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
4
Insurers' medical loss ratios and quality improvement spending in 2011.2011年保险公司的医疗损失率及质量改进支出。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Mar;14:1-9.
5
How Insurers Competed in the Affordable Care Act's First Year.保险公司在《平价医疗法案》实施第一年的竞争方式。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jun;18:1-16.
6
Medical loss ratio regulation under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下的医疗损失率监管。
Inquiry. 2013 Spring;50(1):9-26. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_50.01.05.
7
The federal medical loss ratio rule: implications for consumers in year 3.联邦医疗损失率规则:对第三年消费者的影响。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Mar;6:1-11.
8
Insurers' responses to regulation of medical loss ratios.保险公司对医疗损失率监管的回应。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Dec;26:1-13.
9
What drives insurer participation and premiums in the Federally-Facilitated Marketplace?是什么推动保险公司参与联邦政府推动的医保市场并确定保费?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Dec;17(4):395-412. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9215-y. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Preemption and the MLR provision of the Affordable Care Act.
Am J Law Med. 2014;40(2-3):280-97. doi: 10.1177/009885881404000207.