Division of Behavioral Biology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Oct;38(11):2315-25. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.137. Epub 2013 May 31.
Non-selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of GABAA receptors (GABAARs) are known to impair anterograde memory. The role of the various GABAAR subtypes in the memory-impairing effects of non-selective GABAAR PAMs has not been fully elucidated. The current study assessed, in rhesus monkeys, effects of modulation of α1, α2/3, and α5GABAARs on visual recognition and spatial working memory using delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) and self-ordered spatial search (SOSS) procedures, respectively. The DMTS procedure (n=8) involved selecting a previously presented 'sample' image from a set of multiple images presented after a delay. The SOSS procedure (n=6) involved touching a number of boxes without repeats. The non-selective GABAAR PAM triazolam and the α1GABAA preferential PAMS zolpidem and zaleplon reduced accuracy in both procedures, whereas the α5GABAA preferential PAMs SH-053-2'F-R-CH3 and SH-053-2'F-S-CH3, and the α2/3GABAA preferential PAM TPA023B were without effects on accuracy or trial completion. The low-efficacy α5GABAAR negative allosteric modulator (NAM) PWZ-029 slightly increased only DMTS accuracy, whereas the high-efficacy α5GABAAR NAMs RY-23 and RY-24 did not affect accuracy under either procedure. Finally, the slopes of the accuracy dose-effect curves for triazolam, zolpidem, and zaleplon increased with box number in the SOSS procedure, but were equivalent across DMTS delays. The present results suggest that (1) α1GABAARs, compared with α2/3 and α5GABAARs, are primarily involved in the impairment, by non-selective GABAAR PAMs, of visual recognition and visuospatial working memory in nonhuman primates; and (2) relative cognitive impairment produced by positive modulation of GABAARs increases with number of locations to be remembered, but not with the delay for remembering.
非选择性正变构调节剂 (PAMs) 已被证实会损害顺行性记忆。然而,各种 GABAAR 亚型在非选择性 GABAAR PAMs 致记忆损害效应中的作用尚未完全阐明。本研究在恒河猴中评估了 GABAAR 亚型 α1、α2/3 和 α5 的调制对视觉识别和空间工作记忆的影响,分别使用延迟匹配样本 (DMTS) 和自我有序空间搜索 (SOSS) 程序。DMTS 程序(n=8)包括从呈现延迟后呈现的多个图像中选择之前呈现的“样本”图像。SOSS 程序(n=6)涉及触摸无重复的多个盒子。非选择性 GABAAR PAM 三唑仑和 α1GABAA 优先 PAMs 唑吡坦和扎来普隆降低了两种程序的准确性,而 α5GABAA 优先 PAMs SH-053-2'F-R-CH3 和 SH-053-2'F-S-CH3 以及 α2/3GABAA 优先 PAM TPA023B 对准确性或试验完成率没有影响。低效能 α5GABAAR 负变构调节剂 (NAM) PWZ-029 仅轻微增加 DMTS 准确性,而高效能 α5GABAAR NAMs RY-23 和 RY-24 在两种程序下均不影响准确性。最后,三唑仑、唑吡坦和扎来普隆的准确性剂量-效应曲线斜率在 SOSS 程序中随盒子数量的增加而增加,但在 DMTS 延迟中是等效的。本研究结果表明:(1)与 α2/3 和 α5GABAAR 相比,α1GABAAR 主要参与非选择性 GABAAR PAMs 损害非人类灵长类动物的视觉识别和视空间工作记忆;(2)GABAAR 正向调制引起的相对认知损害随需要记忆的位置数量增加而增加,但与记忆延迟无关。