Suppr超能文献

变构调节 GABA(A) 受体亚型:对恒河猴视觉识别和视空间工作记忆的影响[已更正]。

Allosteric modulation of GABA(A) receptor subtypes:effects on visual recognition and visuospatial working memory in rhesus monkeys [corrected].

机构信息

Division of Behavioral Biology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Oct;38(11):2315-25. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.137. Epub 2013 May 31.

Abstract

Non-selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of GABAA receptors (GABAARs) are known to impair anterograde memory. The role of the various GABAAR subtypes in the memory-impairing effects of non-selective GABAAR PAMs has not been fully elucidated. The current study assessed, in rhesus monkeys, effects of modulation of α1, α2/3, and α5GABAARs on visual recognition and spatial working memory using delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) and self-ordered spatial search (SOSS) procedures, respectively. The DMTS procedure (n=8) involved selecting a previously presented 'sample' image from a set of multiple images presented after a delay. The SOSS procedure (n=6) involved touching a number of boxes without repeats. The non-selective GABAAR PAM triazolam and the α1GABAA preferential PAMS zolpidem and zaleplon reduced accuracy in both procedures, whereas the α5GABAA preferential PAMs SH-053-2'F-R-CH3 and SH-053-2'F-S-CH3, and the α2/3GABAA preferential PAM TPA023B were without effects on accuracy or trial completion. The low-efficacy α5GABAAR negative allosteric modulator (NAM) PWZ-029 slightly increased only DMTS accuracy, whereas the high-efficacy α5GABAAR NAMs RY-23 and RY-24 did not affect accuracy under either procedure. Finally, the slopes of the accuracy dose-effect curves for triazolam, zolpidem, and zaleplon increased with box number in the SOSS procedure, but were equivalent across DMTS delays. The present results suggest that (1) α1GABAARs, compared with α2/3 and α5GABAARs, are primarily involved in the impairment, by non-selective GABAAR PAMs, of visual recognition and visuospatial working memory in nonhuman primates; and (2) relative cognitive impairment produced by positive modulation of GABAARs increases with number of locations to be remembered, but not with the delay for remembering.

摘要

非选择性正变构调节剂 (PAMs) 已被证实会损害顺行性记忆。然而,各种 GABAAR 亚型在非选择性 GABAAR PAMs 致记忆损害效应中的作用尚未完全阐明。本研究在恒河猴中评估了 GABAAR 亚型 α1、α2/3 和 α5 的调制对视觉识别和空间工作记忆的影响,分别使用延迟匹配样本 (DMTS) 和自我有序空间搜索 (SOSS) 程序。DMTS 程序(n=8)包括从呈现延迟后呈现的多个图像中选择之前呈现的“样本”图像。SOSS 程序(n=6)涉及触摸无重复的多个盒子。非选择性 GABAAR PAM 三唑仑和 α1GABAA 优先 PAMs 唑吡坦和扎来普隆降低了两种程序的准确性,而 α5GABAA 优先 PAMs SH-053-2'F-R-CH3 和 SH-053-2'F-S-CH3 以及 α2/3GABAA 优先 PAM TPA023B 对准确性或试验完成率没有影响。低效能 α5GABAAR 负变构调节剂 (NAM) PWZ-029 仅轻微增加 DMTS 准确性,而高效能 α5GABAAR NAMs RY-23 和 RY-24 在两种程序下均不影响准确性。最后,三唑仑、唑吡坦和扎来普隆的准确性剂量-效应曲线斜率在 SOSS 程序中随盒子数量的增加而增加,但在 DMTS 延迟中是等效的。本研究结果表明:(1)与 α2/3 和 α5GABAAR 相比,α1GABAAR 主要参与非选择性 GABAAR PAMs 损害非人类灵长类动物的视觉识别和视空间工作记忆;(2)GABAAR 正向调制引起的相对认知损害随需要记忆的位置数量增加而增加,但与记忆延迟无关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.嗅觉刺激控制与记忆的行为药理学
Behav Anal (Wash D C). 2016 Nov;16(4):169-178. doi: 10.1037/bar0000033. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验