Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3415, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY, 82071, USA,
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1274-81. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6.
Ophir, Nass, and Wagner (Proceedings of the National Association of Sciences 106:15583-15587, 2009) reported that individuals who routinely engage in multiple forms of media use are actually worse at multitasking, possibly due to difficulties in ignoring irrelevant stimuli, from both external sources and internal representations in memory. Using the media multitasking index (MMI) developed by Ophir et al., we identified heavy media multitaskers (HMMs) and light media multitaskers (LMMs) and tested them on measures of attention, working memory, task switching, and fluid intelligence, as well as self-reported impulsivity and self-control. We found that people who reported engaging in heavy amounts of media multitasking reported being more impulsive and performed more poorly on measures of fluid intelligence than did those who did not frequently engage in media multitasking. However, we could find no evidence to support the contention that HMMs are worse in a multitasking situation such as task switching or that they show any deficits in dealing with irrelevant or distracting information, as compared with LMMs.
奥菲尔、纳赛尔和瓦格纳(Proceedings of the National Association of Sciences 106:15583-15587, 2009)报告称,经常参与多种媒体使用的人实际上在多任务处理方面表现更差,这可能是由于他们难以忽略来自外部来源和记忆中内部表示的不相关刺激。我们使用奥菲尔等人开发的媒体多任务指数(MMI),确定了重度媒体多任务者(HMM)和轻度媒体多任务者(LMM),并在注意力、工作记忆、任务切换和流体智力以及自我报告的冲动性和自我控制方面对他们进行了测试。我们发现,与那些不经常进行媒体多任务处理的人相比,报告大量进行媒体多任务处理的人报告说自己更冲动,在流体智力测试中的表现也更差。然而,我们没有发现任何证据支持 HMM 在任务切换等多任务环境中表现更差的说法,也没有发现他们在处理不相关或分散注意力的信息方面存在任何缺陷,与 LMM 相比。