Pai Shruti, Vawter Paul T, Ledoux William R
VA RR&D Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
J Biomech Eng. 2013 Sep;135(9):94501. doi: 10.1115/1.4024572.
Changes in the shear plantar soft tissue properties with diabetes are believed to play a role in plantar ulceration, yet little is known about these properties. Our group recently conducted shear tests on specimens previously tested in compression to fully characterize the tissue under both these loading modes. However, previously tested specimens may not necessarily provide representative mechanical properties as prior testing may have altered the tissue to an unknown extent. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test the effect of prior compression testing on both the plantar soft tissue shear and compressive properties using paired specimens. First, one specimen from each pair was subject to compression using our standard protocol with modifications to compare compressive properties before and after the protocol while the other specimen from each pair was left untested. Then, both specimens (i.e., one previously compression tested and one previously untested) were subject to shear testing. The results indicate that prior compression testing may affect the tissue compressive properties by reducing peak stress and modulus; however, additional testing is needed since these results were likely confounded by stress softening effects. In contrast, neither the elastic nor the viscoelastic plantar soft tissue shear properties were affected by prior testing in compression, indicating that previously compression tested specimens should be viable for use in future shear tests. However, these results are limited given the small sample size of the study and the fact that only nondiabetic specimens were examined.
人们认为,糖尿病患者足底软组织剪切特性的变化在足底溃疡形成中起作用,但对这些特性却知之甚少。我们的团队最近对之前进行过压缩测试的标本进行了剪切测试,以全面表征该组织在这两种加载模式下的情况。然而,之前测试过的标本不一定能提供具有代表性的力学性能,因为之前的测试可能已在未知程度上改变了组织。因此,本研究的目的是使用配对标本测试先前的压缩测试对足底软组织剪切和压缩特性的影响。首先,每对标本中的一个按照我们的标准方案进行压缩,并进行修改以比较方案前后的压缩特性,而每对中的另一个标本则不进行测试。然后,对两个标本(即一个先前经过压缩测试,一个先前未经过测试)进行剪切测试。结果表明,先前的压缩测试可能会通过降低峰值应力和模量来影响组织的压缩特性;然而,由于这些结果可能受到应力软化效应的混淆,因此需要进一步测试。相比之下,先前的压缩测试对足底软组织的弹性和粘弹性剪切特性均无影响,这表明先前经过压缩测试的标本可用于未来的剪切测试。然而,鉴于本研究的样本量较小且仅检查了非糖尿病标本,这些结果存在局限性。