Y. Zhu, MD, Department of Rehabilitation, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;93(11):1447-55. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110138. Epub 2013 May 30.
There is debate concerning the effect of acupuncture on rehabilitation following stroke, with key reviews unable to find evidence of benefit. This lack of evidence may be due to poor study design, small sample size, and insufficient theoretical background.
The present study was designed to determine whether acupuncture combined with conventional physical therapy improves motor function and activities of daily living in patients with subacute stroke compared with conventional physical therapy alone.
A multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study was conducted.
Four rehabilitation centers in the Jiangsu province of China participated in this study.
One hundred eighty-eight patients with subacute stroke admitted to the hospital were randomized into an acupuncture group and a conventional rehabilitation group.
A combination of body and scalp acupuncture was used for 3 months in the acupuncture group. All patients underwent conventional stroke rehabilitation.
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Barthel Index (BI) were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after inclusion in the study.
No statistically significant differences were found at baseline between the groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups using the FMA motor scores and the BI scores at baseline or at 1, 3, or 6 months. Significant improvements were found in each group following treatment.
In patients with subacute stroke, the addition of body and scalp acupuncture to a regimen of conventional physical therapy does not result in further improvement in either motor function or ADL beyond the effect of conventional physical therapy alone.
关于针刺对中风后康复的影响存在争议,主要的综述未能发现其有益的证据。这种缺乏证据可能是由于研究设计不佳、样本量小以及理论背景不足所致。
本研究旨在确定与单纯常规物理疗法相比,针刺结合常规物理疗法是否能改善亚急性期脑卒中患者的运动功能和日常生活活动能力。
这是一项多中心、单盲、随机研究。
中国江苏省的 4 家康复中心参与了这项研究。
188 名住院的亚急性期脑卒中患者被随机分为针刺组和常规康复组。
在针刺组中使用体针和头针联合治疗 3 个月。所有患者均接受常规脑卒中康复治疗。
在基线和纳入研究后 1、3 和 6 个月时进行 Fugl-Meyer 评估(FMA)和 Barthel 指数(BI)。
两组在基线时无统计学差异。两组的 FMA 运动评分和 BI 评分在基线或 1、3 或 6 个月时均无统计学差异。每组在治疗后均有显著改善。
在亚急性期脑卒中患者中,将体针和头针联合常规物理疗法治疗方案不能在常规物理疗法单独治疗的基础上进一步改善运动功能或日常生活活动能力。