• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平装包装:改善国际政策一致性的契机?

Plain packaging: an opportunity for improved international policy coherence?

作者信息

Lencucha Raphael, Drope Jeffrey

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Hosmer House, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1Y5

American Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30(2):281-90. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat038. Epub 2013 May 30.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/dat038
PMID:23723441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4506324/
Abstract

This paper highlights two salient challenges at the intersection of tobacco control and macroeconomic policy-making: (i) the use of trade and investment disputes to undermine and/or stall tobacco control legislation and (ii) the inconsistency, and thus unpredictability, of country positions across the two spheres. In the interest of improving international policy coherence, the authors suggest possible solutions to these two challenges at the national and intergovernmental levels.

摘要

本文突出了烟草控制与宏观经济政策制定交叉领域的两个显著挑战

(i)利用贸易和投资争端来破坏和/或拖延烟草控制立法;(ii)两个领域中各国立场的不一致性,进而导致不可预测性。为提高国际政策的协调性,作者提出了在国家和政府间层面应对这两个挑战的可能解决方案。

相似文献

1
Plain packaging: an opportunity for improved international policy coherence?平装包装:改善国际政策一致性的契机?
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30(2):281-90. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat038. Epub 2013 May 30.
2
A health professional's guide to the intersection of public health with intellectual property rights in trade and investment: the case of tobacco plain packaging.卫生专业人员指南:贸易和投资中的知识产权与公共卫生的交集:以烟草平装为例。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Mar;41(1):52-62. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00195-0.
3
Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty.网络对政策执行的影响:来自一项全球卫生条约的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Attack on Australia: tobacco industry challenges to plain packaging.澳大利亚遇袭:烟草业向平装包装发起挑战。
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Aug;34(3):375-87. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.18. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
5
Tobacco plain packaging legislation: a content analysis of commentary posted on Australian online news.烟草平装立法:对澳大利亚在线新闻评论的内容分析。
Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):361-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.042986. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
6
A Global Public Health Victory for Tobacco Plain-Packaging Laws in Australia.澳大利亚烟草平装法取得的一项全球公共卫生胜利。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):137-138. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6480.
7
Tobacco companies launch legal action against plain packaging.烟草公司对平装包装提起法律诉讼。
BMJ. 2011 Jul 5;343:d4270. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4270.
8
Tobacco plain packaging: Evidence based policy or public health advocacy?烟草平装:基于证据的政策还是公共卫生宣传?
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Jun;26(6):560-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Evolution of tobacco labeling and packaging: international legal considerations and health governance.烟草标签和包装的演变:国际法律考虑因素与健康治理。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):e39-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301029. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
10
A multi-level, multi-jurisdictional strategy: Transnational tobacco companies' attempts to obstruct tobacco packaging restrictions.多层次、多司法管辖区策略:跨国烟草公司试图阻挠烟草包装限制。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):570-583. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1446997. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Political Economy of Tobacco in Mozambique and Zimbabwe: A Triangulation Mixed Methods Protocol.莫桑比克和津巴布韦的烟草政治经济学:三角混合方法协议。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;17(12):4262. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124262.
2
International trade and investment law: a new framework for public health and the common good.国际贸易与投资法:公共卫生与共同利益的新框架。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 8;18(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5486-6.
3
Global tobacco control and economic norms: an analysis of normative commitments in Kenya, Malawi and Zambia.全球烟草控制与经济规范:肯尼亚、马拉维和赞比亚的规范承诺分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):420-428. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy005.
4
Disentangling regional trade agreements, trade flows and tobacco affordability in sub-Saharan Africa.解析撒哈拉以南非洲地区的区域贸易协定、贸易流动与烟草可负担性
Global Health. 2017 Nov 14;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0305-x.
5
Navigating institutional complexity in the health sector: lessons from tobacco control in Kenya.应对卫生部门的机构复杂性:肯尼亚烟草控制的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Dec;31(10):1402-1410. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw094. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
6
Diffusion of innovations theory applied to global tobacco control treaty ratification.创新扩散理论应用于全球烟草控制条约批准
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;145:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco control and trade policy: proactive strategies for integrating policy norms.烟草控制与贸易政策:将政策规范整合的主动策略。
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Jan;34(1):153-64. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2012.36. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
2
Plain packaging of tobacco products in Australia: a novel regulation faces legal challenge.澳大利亚烟草制品平装:一项新规定面临法律挑战。
JAMA. 2012 Jan 18;307(3):261-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.2009.
3
Implications of the World Trade Organization in combating non-communicable diseases.世界贸易组织在防治非传染性疾病方面的影响。
Public Health. 2011 Dec;125(12):832-839. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
4
Philip Morris versus Uruguay: health governance challenged.菲利普·莫里斯国际公司与乌拉圭之战:健康治理面临挑战
Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):852-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61256-1.